2020
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small fixed‐loop transient electromagnetic in tunnel forward geological prediction

Abstract: A B S T R A C TTunnel forward geological prediction is indispensable to tunnel construction. The transient electromagnetic method is widely used in the field of tunnel forward geological prediction. A small fixed-loop transient electromagnetic method adapted to the limited space of a tunnel face is proposed for tunnel forward geological prediction for the first time. This method makes use of a large number of non-central points inside the loop. The obtained numerical simulation and field data show opposite tre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In equation (22), J s m = iωµ 0 M s is the magnetic current density of the source. In equation (23), J s e = iωp s is the current density.…”
Section: Apparent Resistivity Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In equation (22), J s m = iωµ 0 M s is the magnetic current density of the source. In equation (23), J s e = iωp s is the current density.…”
Section: Apparent Resistivity Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, many studies have been conducted on the use of TEM for ground transmission, downhole, or borehole reception, but little research has been conducted on the use of TEM for borehole transmission and borehole reception. Research has mainly focused on numerical simulations of small multi-turn coils based on the whole space TEM theory [20][21][22] and discussion of the transient electromagnetic response characteristics of small coils, as well as inversion interpretation and analysis methods [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has increased the demand for a prediction technique that can detect water‐bearing structures ahead of the tunnel face during tunnel excavation. Currently, many geophysical methods are used to reveal the distribution of water‐bearing structures, and these methods are widely used in tunnel engineering, including seismic methods (Jetschny et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2020; Schwenk et al., 2016; Sloan et al., 2015), ground penetrating radar (Carri`ere et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2018), electromagnetic measurements (Liu & Yin, 2014; Meqbel & Ritter, 2015; Su et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2012; Tietze & Ritter, 2013) and electrical methods (Park et al., 2017; Sener et al., 2021). Of these, the direct current (DC) resistivity method can allow the identification of water‐bearing structures in front of the tunnel face because of the significant difference in resistivity between the water‐bearing structure and the surrounding rock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we can move our receivers to the tunnel space rather than on the surface, it is expected that we can get stronger EM response from deep targets. For instance, this approach has been utilized with the SOTEM system (Su et al, 2010;Xue et al, 2013;Xue et al, 2021;Xue et al, 2022;Chen et al, 2015), they move both the transmitter and receiver to the underground tunnel and successfully improve the signal produced by the water-bearing fault. Chang et al (2019) get the Surface-to-Coal Mine Roadway TEM Responses to Water-Enriched Bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%