1997
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMALL IS POWERFUL: Recollections of a Microbiologist and Oceanographer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intellectual challenge embodied in Darwin's words quoted above still represents the main driving force for many of us trying to understand more of the natural world, but increasingly this is perceived as too unrealistic for the modern world, where scientific research is in danger of being absorbed into society's paid beaurocracy as a service industry. One of my favorite sages, the late Holger Jannasch (1997), commenting on the waste caused by funding pressures, wrote: "The effect is worse on younger scientists, who are not rewarded for tackling a problem with perseverance, but for hopping from one promising or prioritized subject to another; funding, not science, being the ultimate goal". I hope young scientists are wise enough to balance these destructive pressures with the basic joy of science which Holger stated later in the same article: "My critical remarks notwithstanding, I am, as most of my colleagues are, well aware of the privilege of being paid for work that often feels like the pursuit of a hobby".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intellectual challenge embodied in Darwin's words quoted above still represents the main driving force for many of us trying to understand more of the natural world, but increasingly this is perceived as too unrealistic for the modern world, where scientific research is in danger of being absorbed into society's paid beaurocracy as a service industry. One of my favorite sages, the late Holger Jannasch (1997), commenting on the waste caused by funding pressures, wrote: "The effect is worse on younger scientists, who are not rewarded for tackling a problem with perseverance, but for hopping from one promising or prioritized subject to another; funding, not science, being the ultimate goal". I hope young scientists are wise enough to balance these destructive pressures with the basic joy of science which Holger stated later in the same article: "My critical remarks notwithstanding, I am, as most of my colleagues are, well aware of the privilege of being paid for work that often feels like the pursuit of a hobby".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most notably the assumed temperature of 25°C, while the effects of the pressure between one bar and in situ were negligible ( Helgeson, 1969 ). But effects of pressure and temperature on thermodynamic calculations are much less severe than the effects on kinetics ( Jannasch, 1997 ), and even the temperature effect does not influence the conclusions drawn here: The standard Gibbs energy of sulfate reduction per mole acetate, for example, only change from −48.1 to −44.5 kJ (mol acetate) −1 between reference temperature and pressure (25°C, 1 bar) and in situ conditions (2°C, 50 bar) at the Greenlandic sites. Thus, the coarse calculations still allow us to conclude that ΔG r from mineralization of organic carbon to CO 2 was shared between the guilds of fermenters and terminal oxidizers in a ratio of roughly 1:1 regardless of site and sediment age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not easy to explain that science is an adventure and not a career (87). I am still as excited about new results as I was 50 years ago.…”
Section: Swan Song (2014)mentioning
confidence: 98%