“…On the one hand, highly acidic poly (3,4-ethyl-enedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) used as the electron blocking layer and hole selective layer at the anode side resulted in decomposition of small molecules and hindered the selection of an electron transporting layer. 12 Recently, molybdenum sub-oxides (MoO x ) with high work functions (WFs), deposited by vacuum deposition, were demonstrated as promising alternatives to PEDOT:PSS. [11][12][13] On the other hand, although various stable low WF metal oxides, such as TiO x and ZnO, as the electron extraction layer in the cathode side have been widely applied for polymeric solar cells (PSCs) to improve the photovoltaic properties of devices, [14][15][16][17][18] some metal-oxide-based devices have intrinsic limitations including incomplete ligand removal, unbalanced charge carrier injection and transport, or inefficient electron-hole recombination, which result in poor control of the electronic surface properties, high contact resistance or surface recombination.…”