2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2719674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small optical volume terahertz emitting microdisk quantum cascade lasers

Abstract: The authors fabricate and characterize a series of quantum cascade laser micropillars emitting at ≈3.5THz. The optical confinement by double plasmon guiding in the vertical direction creates a large impedance mismatch between the confined optical modes and free space. Thus, unlike standard dielectric structures, large quality (Q) factors are maintained for small radius to wavelength ratios. The narrow bandwidth of the optical mode results in low threshold current (8mA) single-mode lasers. Cavity pulling enable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the frequency position of the peak gain becomes very sensitive to the electric field, which along with the waveguide loss frequency dependence sets the lasing frequency at 3.22 THz. At T max , the MC model predicts a peak-gain or equivalently a waveguide loss of 37.5 cm −1 , a value that is consistent with a previous measurement by cavity frequency pulling [35]. Since the employed MC model does not include stimulated emission, the simulated current and experimental laser IV should be compared only when transport is dominated by the non-radiative scattering, i.e.…”
Section: Analysis Of Lasing Frequencymentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Therefore, the frequency position of the peak gain becomes very sensitive to the electric field, which along with the waveguide loss frequency dependence sets the lasing frequency at 3.22 THz. At T max , the MC model predicts a peak-gain or equivalently a waveguide loss of 37.5 cm −1 , a value that is consistent with a previous measurement by cavity frequency pulling [35]. Since the employed MC model does not include stimulated emission, the simulated current and experimental laser IV should be compared only when transport is dominated by the non-radiative scattering, i.e.…”
Section: Analysis Of Lasing Frequencymentioning
confidence: 51%
“…2, the lasing frequency shifts monotonically and increases by 1.6 GHz from 30 to 46 mA (corresponding to 10.8 to 11.4 V), with the rate of 98 MHz/mA. This blue shift is most likely due to the frequency pulling of a Stark-shifted gain spectrum [20]. This observation indicates that the QCL behaves as a voltage controlled oscillator for the bias range of interest, which is required for phase-locking [7], [8].…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, the lasing frequency shifts monotonically and increases by 1.6 GHz from 30 to 46 mA (corresponding to 10.8-11.4 V), with the rate of 98 MHz/mA. This blueshift is most likely due to the frequency pulling of a Stark-shifted gain spectrum [16]. The tuning mechanism, which has a time constant of approximately picoseconds, is much faster than the thermal tuning ͑Ͼ1 ms͒ that results in a redshift [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%