2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small plastic debris in sediments from the Central Adriatic Sea: Types, occurrence and distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirectly, however, the data on the presence of MPs reported for sediments collected in the Gulf of Trieste (133.3 items/kg dry sediment shoreline and 155.6 items/kg dry sediment infralittoral) provide an indication of the importance of the contribution of these rivers [41]. The same considerations, still relative to the Adriatic area, are valid for the Livenza and Lemene rivers, Adige, Reno, Lamone, Fiumi Uniti, Bevano, and Pescara, although not directly monitored, of which the order of magnitude of the contribution of MPs can be deduced from the values found in the sediments of marine areas subject to their influence [42][43][44][45]. In particular, very high levels of MPs were found in the sampling stations located between the mouth of the Livenza and Lemene rivers (700 items/kg dry sediment, [44]) and between the mouth of the United Rivers and the Bevano river, (1512 ± 187 items/kg dry sediment [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Indirectly, however, the data on the presence of MPs reported for sediments collected in the Gulf of Trieste (133.3 items/kg dry sediment shoreline and 155.6 items/kg dry sediment infralittoral) provide an indication of the importance of the contribution of these rivers [41]. The same considerations, still relative to the Adriatic area, are valid for the Livenza and Lemene rivers, Adige, Reno, Lamone, Fiumi Uniti, Bevano, and Pescara, although not directly monitored, of which the order of magnitude of the contribution of MPs can be deduced from the values found in the sediments of marine areas subject to their influence [42][43][44][45]. In particular, very high levels of MPs were found in the sampling stations located between the mouth of the Livenza and Lemene rivers (700 items/kg dry sediment, [44]) and between the mouth of the United Rivers and the Bevano river, (1512 ± 187 items/kg dry sediment [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Particularly films are interesting, with a distinct shape and accounting for an important fraction of microplastic pollution in marine sediments. [50][51][52][53][54][55] It is found that including films in the analysis, significantly impacts the results related to the best-available drag model. To illustrate, the most 19 30 which is a function of CSF as single shape descriptor, performs below average as can be seen from Table 6, despite its unique focus on microplastics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the abundance of polyethylene and polypropylene, relative to other polymers, declines with water depth (Figure 1). Thus, their abundance ranged from not reported to the second most abundant microplastic in coastal sediments from Portuguese shelf waters (7-27 m deep, (Frias et al 2016), sediments in the Adriatic (7-142 m deep, (Mistri et al 2017) and subsurface waters between Germany and South Africa (11 m deep, (Kanhai et al 2017) (Table 4). Of three surveys that sampled microplastics from the deep sea (Bergmann et al 2017, Courtene-Jones et al 2017, Woodall et al 2014 (Table 4), two reported small amounts of polyethylene or polypropylene from two, while the other did not report either.…”
Section: Discussionfate Of Aquatic Plastic Littermentioning
confidence: 99%