2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small punch testing of P91 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
55
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 22 Experimental results and lifetimes predicted by the upper and lower bounds for a large number of tempered martensitic materials at temperatures between 500 and 700 • C (CEA/SRMA, Abe et al 2001;Milicka and Dobes 2006;Sklenička et al 2003;Gaffard 2005;Sawada et al 2001;Abe 2008) This is due to the use of the lower and upper limits of δ D r under the exponent k(≈ 90) that leads to a difference by a factor 2.5, and lower and upper bounds of the fraction t min /t R that causes a difference by a factor 1.6. Therefore, to improve lifetime prediction, the time fraction, t min /t R , and (if possible) the initial variation of the diameter δ D should be more accurately measured.…”
Section: Derivation Of Simple Lower and Upper Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 22 Experimental results and lifetimes predicted by the upper and lower bounds for a large number of tempered martensitic materials at temperatures between 500 and 700 • C (CEA/SRMA, Abe et al 2001;Milicka and Dobes 2006;Sklenička et al 2003;Gaffard 2005;Sawada et al 2001;Abe 2008) This is due to the use of the lower and upper limits of δ D r under the exponent k(≈ 90) that leads to a difference by a factor 2.5, and lower and upper bounds of the fraction t min /t R that causes a difference by a factor 1.6. Therefore, to improve lifetime prediction, the time fraction, t min /t R , and (if possible) the initial variation of the diameter δ D should be more accurately measured.…”
Section: Derivation Of Simple Lower and Upper Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pre L pre = yield L yield (20) Expressing equation (20) in the form of equation (21), it is possible to derive d pre as in equation (22) (22) L pre and L yield are given in equation (23) and in equation (24), respectively, where L 0 is the initial specimen gauge length.…”
Section: Plastic Part Of Pre-strainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimen designs are simple (a disk) and therefore far easier to manufacture than, say, the miniature samples proposed by the Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) [1]. Unlike other creep samples, such as the small ring specimen [2], the small punch creep test specimen is taken to failure, therefore it is expected that creep rupture data can also be evaluated using SPCT [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportionality factor k is probably independent on the temperature; however, it is dependent on the thickness of the disc θ 0 and the geometry of the actual small-punch device, which has recently been confirmed by Milička and Dobeš [18]. In this paper we tried to use an improved powerlaw, stress-dependent, energy-barrier model to describe the creep behaviour of 9Cr-1Mo-0.2V steel during small-punch creep testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The value of this stress is not known, since only the load P is measured for a particular disc thickness and geometry of the small-punch testing device. Since Milička and Dobeš [17,18] experimentally determined the linear dependence between the stress σ during a conventional, uniaxial, tensile creep test and the load P during a smallpunch creep test, which results in an identical time-to rupture t r (Eq. (3)), Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%