2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small RNA Sequencing across Diverse Biofluids Identifies Optimal Methods for exRNA Isolation

Abstract: Graphical AbstractHighlights d exRNA sequencing complexity and reproducibility varies across isolation methods d Deconvolution shows differential access to exRNA carriers by different methods d Performance of exRNA isolation methods vary across biofluids and RNA species d miRDaR enables customized selection of optimal exRNA isolation methods SUMMARYPoor reproducibility within and across studies arising from lack of knowledge regarding the performance of extracellular RNA (exRNA) isolation methods has hindered … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
269
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
15
269
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For isolated RNA, the median CV was higher with small RNA-sequencing (33.4%) than with EdgeSeq (14.4%). As previously reported for RNA-seq (Srinivasan et al, 2019), CVs decreased as signal increased, but overall CVs remained higher for the plasma RNA samples than for the synthetic pools.…”
Section: Analysis Of Reproducibility In Plasma Samplessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For isolated RNA, the median CV was higher with small RNA-sequencing (33.4%) than with EdgeSeq (14.4%). As previously reported for RNA-seq (Srinivasan et al, 2019), CVs decreased as signal increased, but overall CVs remained higher for the plasma RNA samples than for the synthetic pools.…”
Section: Analysis Of Reproducibility In Plasma Samplessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Signal intensities between data generated from isolated RNA versus crude plasma were moderately well correlated for EdgeSeq (R = 0.62, Supplemental Figure 6). To assess whether the use of crude biofluid biased against miRNAs carried in certain subcompartments in plasma, we inspected signals for miRNAs previously found to be differentially associated with 5 different subcompartments in human serum: CD63+ EVs, CD81/CD9+ EVs, AGO2+ RNPs, HDL, and lipoprotein-free fraction (LFF) (Srinivasan et al, 2019). We found no obvious systematic differences in signal according to the assigned subcompartment (Supplemental Figure 6), suggesting that EdgeSeq is capable of detecting miRNAs that are preferentially associated with each subcompartment within crude plasma samples.…”
Section: Analysis Of Reproducibility In Plasma Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the discovery cohort, 20 different biofluids were collected in two donors or in a pool of [4][5] donors. In the case/control cohorts, selected biofluids (sputum, CSF, urine and saliva) were collected in [8][9][10][11][12] patients and an equal number of healthy controls. Both small RNA sequencing and mRNA capture sequencing were performed in the discovery cohort.…”
Section: Fig1 Study Flow Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the characterization of exRNAs in biofluids has mainly focused on small RNAs in blood derived samples [1][2][3][4][7][8][9][10] . MicroRNA (miRNA) is the most studied small RNA biotype in biofluids, but other small RNAs, such as piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), transfer RNA fragments (tRNAs) and Y-RNAs have also been identified 5,6,8,[10][11][12] . While most studies have focused on plasma and serum, some groups have investigated the small RNA content of other human biofluids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation