2015
DOI: 10.5455/ijlr.20151005105350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Ruminant Fetal Wastage at Asella Abattoir in Central Ethiopia; Reflection on Potential Country Level Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic losses associated with indiscriminate slaughtering of pregnant animals in abattoirs in Nigeria have been quantified and reported to be huge (running into millions of dollars annually) and findings from this study support other previous findings in the country and other African countries (Alhaji & Odetokun, 2013;Awoyomi et al, 2013;Bokko, 2011;Nma, 2011;Nonga, 2015;Tamirat et al, 2015). The cyclic trends and patterns of pregnant animal slaughtering and subsequent foetal wastage will continue until improvements in legislation/ policies and best standard practices for abattoirs concerning meat inspections and animal welfare are enhanced in the country.…”
Section: Foetal Wastage Patternssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The economic losses associated with indiscriminate slaughtering of pregnant animals in abattoirs in Nigeria have been quantified and reported to be huge (running into millions of dollars annually) and findings from this study support other previous findings in the country and other African countries (Alhaji & Odetokun, 2013;Awoyomi et al, 2013;Bokko, 2011;Nma, 2011;Nonga, 2015;Tamirat et al, 2015). The cyclic trends and patterns of pregnant animal slaughtering and subsequent foetal wastage will continue until improvements in legislation/ policies and best standard practices for abattoirs concerning meat inspections and animal welfare are enhanced in the country.…”
Section: Foetal Wastage Patternssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our findings revealed that the ratio of female to male animals slaughtered in the SH was 5:1, i.e., female cattle animals are five times more likely to be slaughtered than male. Several studies within Nigeria (Adama et al, 2011;Adeyemi et al, 2016;Hassan et al, 2016;Onyinye et al, 2018;Raimi et al, 2017) and in other African countries (Swai et al, 2015;Tamirat et al, 2015;Tasiame et al, 2016) have reported higher rates of female livestock animals slaughter. Nevertheless, other authors have documented otherwise (Bello et al, 2012;Uduak & Samuel, 2014;Alhaji et al, 2015;Ogunbodede & Oladele, 2016;Baba et al, 2018).…”
Section: Pattern Of Female Cattle Slaughteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abattoir post-mortem examination revealed that 65 of the female small ruminants examined including 36.3% of ewes and 27.6% of doe's were pregnant. This was lower than the 72.2% and 57.3% abattoir pregnancy wastage levels previously reported in Asella [28] and Jigjige [36], respectively. Likewise, higher levels of small ruminant pregnancy wastage has been reported from other parts of the world by Emady (1976) [37], 57.5% and Goossens, et al [25] 60.0%.…”
Section: Genital Bacterial Profi Lecontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Effective pregnancy detection system are lacking in most Ethiopian abattoirs [22], which opens room for substantial pregnancy wastage. In line with this, small ruminant abattoir pregnancy wastage of 72.2% has been reported in Asella leading to an estimated gross annual loss of 120,000 -200,000 US $ [28].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%