1970
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(70)90007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-scale auroral arc distortions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
161
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
161
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that without a resistive layer a combination of KH and tearing instabilities lead to vortices similar to folds and the eventual breakup of the planar arc into distorted fine-scale sheets and filamentary currents, while with a resistive layer KH instability dominates leading to the formation of auroral folds. Our observations may fit their prediction as follows: in the first stage, within a thin diffuse arc of a few km width, the flow shear across the arc is typically a few km/s, leading to a small linear KH growth rate of Hallinan and Davis [1970] of about 5 s at maximum. In the second stage, the arc is getting thicker and brighter, the flow shear is getting larger up to 10 km/s with a large linear KH growth rate of 0.5 s at maximum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They showed that without a resistive layer a combination of KH and tearing instabilities lead to vortices similar to folds and the eventual breakup of the planar arc into distorted fine-scale sheets and filamentary currents, while with a resistive layer KH instability dominates leading to the formation of auroral folds. Our observations may fit their prediction as follows: in the first stage, within a thin diffuse arc of a few km width, the flow shear across the arc is typically a few km/s, leading to a small linear KH growth rate of Hallinan and Davis [1970] of about 5 s at maximum. In the second stage, the arc is getting thicker and brighter, the flow shear is getting larger up to 10 km/s with a large linear KH growth rate of 0.5 s at maximum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The triggering mechanism has been one of the longest-standing unsolved problems in the magnetospheric physics. Highly sensitive TV observations have shown three basic auroral forms, namely spirals, folds, and curls, which differ from each other in their sizes, vorticities, velocities [Hallinan and Davis, 1970]. Auroral spirals are large-scale vortex configurations with typical sizes from tens to hundreds of km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear effects, particularly the convective nonlinearity in the perpendicular equation of motion, can be important in creating the complicated structure in the aurora [e.g., Seyler, 1988Seyler, , 1990Chaston et al, 2008]. Such nonlinear motions can be excited by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability giving rise to auroral curls [Hallinan and Davis, 1970]. Furthermore, ionospheric feedback instability [Atkinson, 1970;Holzer and Sato, 1973;Sato, 1978;Lysak, 1991;Streltsov and Lotko, 2008] can generate small-scale Alfvén waves due to the interaction with the ionosphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional characteristic of such a potential distribution is the existence above the acceleration region of a strong convergent perpendicular electric field. The convergent electric field has also been inferred from the Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices (auroral rays) in arcs [Hallinan and Davis, 1970] and from the countervailing drift motions of the auroral rays in adjacent arc elements [Hallinan and Davis, 1970;Carlqvist and Bostrom, 1970]. The convergent field is often measured by satellites operating above the acceleration region (above 1-2 R•) [Mozer et al, 1977].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%