2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2021.104483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-scale bedforms and associated sediment transport in a macro-tidal lower shoreface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(131 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When bedforms are present, the main contribution to the roughness is through the form drag associated with their dimensions, as defined by the quantity H 2 /L (for example, k s '' 20H 2 /L in the Chézy coefficient definition of Van Rijn (2006;, where k s '' is the form roughness height of Nikuradse). In certain field settings, waves and currents each have their own roughness, e.g., combined strong waves and weak orthogonal currents over twodimensional bedforms (Guerrero et al, 2021). However, it is reasonable to assume that there is a common wave-current roughness based on the main bedform heights and lengths in the study area, because of the varied wave-current angle, varied relative strengths of the waves and the currents, and the general three-dimensionality of the bedforms.…”
Section: Discussion and Implications: Roughness Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When bedforms are present, the main contribution to the roughness is through the form drag associated with their dimensions, as defined by the quantity H 2 /L (for example, k s '' 20H 2 /L in the Chézy coefficient definition of Van Rijn (2006;, where k s '' is the form roughness height of Nikuradse). In certain field settings, waves and currents each have their own roughness, e.g., combined strong waves and weak orthogonal currents over twodimensional bedforms (Guerrero et al, 2021). However, it is reasonable to assume that there is a common wave-current roughness based on the main bedform heights and lengths in the study area, because of the varied wave-current angle, varied relative strengths of the waves and the currents, and the general three-dimensionality of the bedforms.…”
Section: Discussion and Implications: Roughness Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bed-level change pattern of the middle tidal flat was the most dynamic and difficult to predict (Fan et al, 2006). Additionally, there was no clear ripple migration signal in the bed-level series, as sheet flow during wind events tends to wash out ripples (Li and Amos, 1999;Thorne et al, 2018;Guerrero et al, 2021).…”
Section: Intratidal Bed Level Changes Of Sheltered Mudflatmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This matches the typical ripple migration parameters of mudflats (Baas et al, 2013;Lin and Venditti, 2013;Zhu, 2017). Under dynamic environments with changing currents and waves, reworking and mobilization of bed sediments leads to formation of bed ripples in coastal systems (Catano-Lopera and Garcia, 2006;Thorne et al, 2018;Guerrero and Guillen, 2020;Guerrero et al, 2021;Stella, 2021). Bed ripples preferably occur in the presence of waves (Chakraborty, 2001;Lorenz and Valdez, 2011;Guerrero and Guillen, 2020;Jin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Intratidal Bed Level Changes Of Sheltered Mudflatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The streaming due to the free surface effect (an onshore boundary layer streaming under the influence of vertical orbital motions in the horizontal non-uniform flow under progressive waves) contributes substantially to an increased onshore sediment transport rate (Kranenburg et al, 2013). Wave-induced currents (as undertow) and the coastal ocean currents (due to tides, winds, and other mechanisms) can also contribute to a net sediment transport rate in the current direction (Guerrero et al, 2021), for example, the experiments conducted by McLean et al (2001) and Dong et al (2013). Dissimilar responses for different size fractions in graded sediment further lead to interactions between fractions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%