1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0297-8_68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Scale Intermittency and the Renormalization Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 (multimedia view). Thus, our numerical observation shows quite good agreement with the theoretical prediction obtained by KMRS theory [16][17][18]. The set of fitting parameters for Eq.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…10 (multimedia view). Thus, our numerical observation shows quite good agreement with the theoretical prediction obtained by KMRS theory [16][17][18]. The set of fitting parameters for Eq.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As there exists strong velocity shear between the vortex layer, such initial conditions are inherently Kelvin-Helmholtz unstable and hence leads to turbulence. Our results are compared with the statistical mechanical model of patch vortices [16][17][18] (KMRS theory) from small to large initial circulation values and a systematic deviation from sinh-Poisson model is demonstrated for increasing values of C + & C − or in other words, for increasing area of occupancy of nonzero circulation. As is well known, maximum number of scales k max resolvable at a grid size say N grid is k max ∼ N grid /3 [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations