2013
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2013.779342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-Scale Rubber Planting for Enhancement of People's Livelihoods: A Comparative Study in Three South Asian Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that rubber-specialized households in Manlin are highly affected by fluctuating commodity prices also corroborates findings that rubber farming has generally reduced income diversification in Xishuangbanna [8,16,33,34]. How the local people respond to the drop in rubber prices may be contingent on a number of aspects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our finding that rubber-specialized households in Manlin are highly affected by fluctuating commodity prices also corroborates findings that rubber farming has generally reduced income diversification in Xishuangbanna [8,16,33,34]. How the local people respond to the drop in rubber prices may be contingent on a number of aspects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…There are other possibilities for incorporating agroforestry systems, with the potential for a range of benefits including increased household food security and wider ecosystem services ( Cheatham et al, 2009 ; Jose, 2009 ; Swift, Izac & van Noordwijk, 2004 ). For example, there is the potential to develop longer-term rubber intercropping systems, to buffer fluctuating rubber prices ( Cramb et al, 2009 ; Nath, Inoue & De Zoysa, 2013 ), by altering rubber tree planting arrangements to allow greater resource availability for other crops ( Rodrigo, Silva & Munasinghe, 2004 ), depending on the stage of development of the local systems ( Barlow, 1997 ; Dressler & Pulhin, 2010 ) and the availability of other options for income ( Dressler & Fabinyi, 2011 ; Langenberger et al, in press ; Neyra-Cabatac, Pulhin & Cabanilla, 2012 ). In such a system, a managed understory can be integrated in place of additional trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manuscript to be reviewed There are other possibilities for incorporating agroforestry systems, with the potential for a range of benefits including increased household food security and wider ecosystem services (Cheatham et al 2009;Jose 2009;Swift et al 2004). For example, there is the potential to develop longer-term rubber intercropping systems, to buffer fluctuating rubber prices (Cramb et al 2009;Nath et al 2013), by altering rubber tree planting arrangements to allow greater resource availability for other crops (Rodrigo et al 2004), depending on the stage of development of the local systems (Barlow 1997;Dressler & Pulhin 2010) and the availability of other options for income (Dressler & Fabinyi 2011;Langenberger et al 2016;Neyra-Cabatac et al 2012). In such a system, a managed understory can be integrated in place of additional trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%