2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00182-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-scale spatial and temporal variance in the concentration of heavy metals in aquatic sediments: a review and some new concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The repeated sampling at the same station in the Arno catchment allowed the recognition of systematic variations of the chemical composition for only six stations (A17, A15 and A11, Arno; IX, Sieve; V, Pesa; II, Usciana). The differences were ascribed to marked textural difference, as indicated by the large relative standard deviations of SiO 2 (up to 12%), Al 2 O 3 (up to 16.5%) and Zr/ Rb (up to 56%), despite the fact that the sediments had been sieved to reduce the uncertainty related to grain size (see Birch et al, 2001b, for a discussion of the problem). Textural differences are related to different hydrological conditions during the sampling periods, namely the reduction of flow discharge particularly evident in the summer 1997 survey, which produced a relative enrichment in the fine-grained fraction of the sediments in some stations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repeated sampling at the same station in the Arno catchment allowed the recognition of systematic variations of the chemical composition for only six stations (A17, A15 and A11, Arno; IX, Sieve; V, Pesa; II, Usciana). The differences were ascribed to marked textural difference, as indicated by the large relative standard deviations of SiO 2 (up to 12%), Al 2 O 3 (up to 16.5%) and Zr/ Rb (up to 56%), despite the fact that the sediments had been sieved to reduce the uncertainty related to grain size (see Birch et al, 2001b, for a discussion of the problem). Textural differences are related to different hydrological conditions during the sampling periods, namely the reduction of flow discharge particularly evident in the summer 1997 survey, which produced a relative enrichment in the fine-grained fraction of the sediments in some stations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling was undertaken during dry weather conditions, with at least five dry days prior to sampling. Two 500 mL aliquots were taken 15 min apart and composited to provide an average concentration over the given time interval to reduce temporal field variance (US EPA 1995;Birch et al 2001). Field and laboratory blanks (deionised water) were taken on the first and last days, and duplicates samples were taken each fourth sample.…”
Section: Base Flow Water Quality Assessment Of Iron Cove Creekmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, sediments are significantly more enriched with lithogenic elements compared to the fluvisol. [2,6,35,36] The geochemistry of large rivers will provide insights to the erosional processes of the study region on a global scale due to the differential mobility taking place between the metals by denudation. [37,38] Water-rock interaction, especially at low temperature is unlikely to cause substantial change in REE distribution in all sediments.…”
Section: Areal Distribution Of the Geochemical Dominant Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Sediments act as a sink of inorganic pollutants (potentially toxic elements/metals) and provide a history of anthropogenic pollutant input. [5] Toxic metals pollution in sediments has been proved to be an increasingly global problem, which is considered to pose a serious threat to the aquatic environment resulting from their toxicity, non-biodegradable and persistent nature, and the bio-enrichment ability in food chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%