2016
DOI: 10.1177/2333794x16669013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Steps in Impacting Clinical Auscultation of Medical Students

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine if a training module improves the auscultation skills of medical students at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. Second-year medical students completed pretests on 12 heart sounds followed by a 45-minute training module on clinical auscultation, with retesting immediately after the intervention and during their third-year pediatrics clerkship. The control group consisted of third-year medical students who did not have the intervention. There was a 23% imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of the MS even after the intervention. The results of our study are consistent with the study of Birdane et al (2012) and Binka et al (2016), where students also better recognized systolic murmurs compared to diastolic murmurs [7], [17]. Physical examination has limited ability to evaluate diastolic murmurs, with a sensitivity of only 14-33% for the diagnosis of aortic regurgitation [18], [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There was no significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of the MS even after the intervention. The results of our study are consistent with the study of Birdane et al (2012) and Binka et al (2016), where students also better recognized systolic murmurs compared to diastolic murmurs [7], [17]. Physical examination has limited ability to evaluate diastolic murmurs, with a sensitivity of only 14-33% for the diagnosis of aortic regurgitation [18], [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…4 The results showed that the highest sensitivity to auscultation was in the senior stage pediatric resident, 42% and the lowest sensitivity in the junior stage pediatric resident, 12%, while the specificity was 88% -90.7%. 6,11,13 The study of Haney et al (1999) showed that the sensitivity and specificity of cardiac auscultation examination in pediatricians were 82% and 24%, which…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps only a portion of the heart defects will be detected on screening by cardiac auscultation, but this method is currently better than other screening methods such as echocardiography which are difficult to perform. 7,[10][11][12][13] This study aims to determine the accuracy of the screening method by listening to heart murmurs by various competency levels of doctors in the detection of heart defects in children in Palembang City.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention group demonstrated a significant increase in the ability to successfully identify eight of the 12 heart sounds. The eight heart sounds identified at higher percentages posttest were continuous murmur (81% vs 51%, p<0.001), systolic click (51% vs 22%, p<0.001), pericardial rub (94% vs 56%, p<0.001), fourth heart sound (70% vs 18%, p<0.001), innocent murmur (69% vs 37%, p<0.001), third heart sound (39% vs 6%, p<0.001), tricuspid regurgitation (62% vs 38%, p<0.001), and split in inspiration (52% vs 28%, p<0.001) [ 8 ]. These exact percentages were not provided numerically within the publication but were approximated by referencing the axes of the bar graphs depicted within the study report.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%