2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/6752048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-World and Scale-Free Network Models for IoT Systems

Abstract: It is expected that Internet of Things (IoT) revolution will enable new solutions and business for consumers and entrepreneurs by connecting billions of physical world devices with varying capabilities. However, for successful realization of IoT, challenges such as heterogeneous connectivity, ubiquitous coverage, reduced network and device complexity, enhanced power savings, and enhanced resource management have to be solved. All these challenges are heavily impacted by the IoT network topology supported by ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Barabasi-Albert is a model for scale-free 1 networks such as the World Wide Web (w3), characterized by a highly heterogeneous degree distribution and high modularity (groups of the nodes that are more densely connected together than to the rest of the network). Erdos-Renyi model, known as a random network, has low heterogeneity, short average paths, and low clustering [70], [71]. Watts-Strogatz is a model for small-world 2 networks which are very close structurally to social networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barabasi-Albert is a model for scale-free 1 networks such as the World Wide Web (w3), characterized by a highly heterogeneous degree distribution and high modularity (groups of the nodes that are more densely connected together than to the rest of the network). Erdos-Renyi model, known as a random network, has low heterogeneity, short average paths, and low clustering [70], [71]. Watts-Strogatz is a model for small-world 2 networks which are very close structurally to social networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, E i is the real edges of the neighbor node i, K i is the total neighbors connected to the neuron i, and K i (K i − 1)/2 is the maximum number of possible connectivities between the neighbor neurons. Hence, C i denotes a ratio of real neighbor neuron connectivity to the maximum possible connectivities [42]. The clustering coefficient for HCESN-KM, HCESN-GA, HCESN-DE, and HCESN-PSO reservoirs was computed as C HCESN-KM = 0.4727, C HCESN-GA = 0.4811, C HCESN-DE = 0.4827, and C HCESN-PSO = 0.4916.…”
Section: Small-world Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the scale-free networks exhibit a power-law degree distribution, which predicts the existence of a small number of well-connected nodes. 20 For the optical network simulation, both the models mentioned above have been widely used, 21,22 and however the accurate model for the real optical network is still under investigation. 23,24 In this article, the ONUs and OLTEs are regarded as the nodes in the network, and we only focus on the logical links between these nodes.…”
Section: Random and Scale-free Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%