2011
DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2011.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smallholder farmer participation in local and regional food aid procurement:Assessing the benefits and challenges in southwestern Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, observations, and informal discussions were conducted with smallholder farmers belonging to the Manyakabi Area Cooperative Enterprise; a cooperative association in south-western Uganda's Mbarara and Isingiro districts. This study's findings originate from a research project examining a local and regional food aid procurement initiative within the smallholder community (see Ferguson and Kepe 2011). During fieldwork for this initial project, the significant role of the cooperative as a driving force for social empowerment was realised.…”
Section: Case-study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, observations, and informal discussions were conducted with smallholder farmers belonging to the Manyakabi Area Cooperative Enterprise; a cooperative association in south-western Uganda's Mbarara and Isingiro districts. This study's findings originate from a research project examining a local and regional food aid procurement initiative within the smallholder community (see Ferguson and Kepe 2011). During fieldwork for this initial project, the significant role of the cooperative as a driving force for social empowerment was realised.…”
Section: Case-study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ao se deparar com dificuldades em angariar (identificar e acessar) produtores para a pesquisa, situação normal em ambientes rurais (MASUDA & GARVIN, 2008;FERGUSON & KEPE, 2011) optou-se pela amostragem de "snowball" (MILES & HUBERMAN, 1994;MERCADO Et. Al., 2016).…”
Section: Procedimentos Metodológicosunclassified
“…P4P works on the premise that food transfers positively impact the food security of recipient communities (demand side) as well as improving the livelihoods (and thereby, food security) of small-scale, poor producers (supply side). Evidence from P4P suggests additional demand has been created, leading to higher prices, which in turn have provided a production stimulus, leading to an increase in food supply and availability (USDA, 2009;Ferguson and Kepe, 2011 cited in Coles forthcoming).…”
Section: Box 3 Key Issues: How Can Inputs Transfer Programmes Contribmentioning
confidence: 99%