2016
DOI: 10.1109/access.2016.2525041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart City Wireless Connectivity Considerations and Cost Analysis: Lessons Learnt From Smart Water Case Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the SWG system is evaluated here based on cost. There are two types of SWG systems [14], 1) field devices that interface with the existing SCADA systems of the utility providers, and 2) field devices (with or without a gateway) and a backend cloud server. In Pakistan, there are currently no SCADA or SWG systems for tube wells.…”
Section: Smart Water Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the SWG system is evaluated here based on cost. There are two types of SWG systems [14], 1) field devices that interface with the existing SCADA systems of the utility providers, and 2) field devices (with or without a gateway) and a backend cloud server. In Pakistan, there are currently no SCADA or SWG systems for tube wells.…”
Section: Smart Water Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Harvard Business Bureau states that connection to external devices gives these objects new functionality, such as the ability to monitor their environment, be remotely controlled, automate their functions, and provide data for optimization [14]. However, these functions are better suited to fog nodes, as the distance between an end device to a cloud data-center may introduce too much latency for the ''seamless'' integration of objects into the network [23]. Fog nodes are a type of edge device that can provide the services of cloud servers, but at a ''grounded'' level [37].…”
Section: A Internet Of Things Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed system will save water and provide good quality of water to people. Kulkarni and Farnham (2016) his article provided an overview of issues involved in water monitoring and management and highlighted the wire-less connectivity considerations to enable smart water man-agement. Challenges and design considerations involved in choosing from a variety of architectural approaches to realise communications were highlighted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%