Dynamic Quality Models and Games in Digital Supply Chains 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-66537-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart Contracts and Blockchain for Supply Chain Quality Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firms looking at the development of an omnichannel strategy can evaluate the adoption of blockchain to mitigate all SC inefficiencies. The literature has highlighted how blockchain can enhance the economic and operational value of all the activities across the SC (Ksherti, 2018), from manufacturing to warehousing (De Giovanni, 2021), transportation and logistics (van Hoek, 2019) and global sourcing and smart contracts (De Giovanni, 2020). By implementing blockchain technology, all partners involved in the network (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms looking at the development of an omnichannel strategy can evaluate the adoption of blockchain to mitigate all SC inefficiencies. The literature has highlighted how blockchain can enhance the economic and operational value of all the activities across the SC (Ksherti, 2018), from manufacturing to warehousing (De Giovanni, 2021), transportation and logistics (van Hoek, 2019) and global sourcing and smart contracts (De Giovanni, 2020). By implementing blockchain technology, all partners involved in the network (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages have been explored by two approaches: theoretical and empirical. Regarding the theoretical approach, De Giovanni (2021) uses a game theory approach to investigate how the blockchain can incentivize firms to pursue a more efficient CLSC process by continuously monitoring the residual value of returns. Hence, he suggests using the blockchain to mitigate distortions linked to the returns' uncertainty surrounding quantity, quality and time.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from traditional IS (information systems) where the information is centralized, the blockchain ensures that all the SC members and the stakeholders involved in a certain transaction share the same verified information, which is then decentralized (Hackius and Petersen, 2017). By granting SC visibility, the blockchain allows firms to optimize the whole network of relationships behind the SC and work with diffused trust, commitment and transparency; hence, the traditional monitoring mechanisms are not necessarily needed (De Giovanni, 2021). In fact, the firms can use the blockchain to verify and monitor the state of products in each SC tier (Welfare, 2019) and automatically record information by using both the digital technologies and the oracles; those systems allow the smart contracts to be updated accordingly (De Giovanni, 2021) and keep track of SC members' and stakeholders' performance and behaviors (Lakhani and Iansiti, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations