Smart Contracts Contracts

Bartoletti, Massimo

doi:10.3389/fbloc.2020.00027

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A digital contract entered into with a smart contract is subject to the general contracting rules [7]. Blockchain technology [8] is not the only applicable technology for a smart contract [9], and other distributed ledger technologies are also used. The Russian legislation does not establish any restrictions on the types of technologies used.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Property turnover digitalisation: Interdisciplinary problems of post-classical jurisprudence

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the research is to consider the key interdisciplinary research and practice problems of the property turnover digitalisation and propose ways to solve them. Elements, phenomena and processes of the digital environment first appeared in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family. By determining the constitutive features of them, the authors turned to classical domestic and foreign legal statutory concepts and policy management. The research was carried out by the comparative-legal method and modelling method. The identification of interdisciplinary research and practice problems as well as methods for solving them was based on the methods for ascent from the abstract to the concrete, induction and deduction. As a result of the implementation of the research objectives through the general scientific and private scientific methods described above, the authors identified the constitutive features of the key elements of property turnover in the digital environment, such as digital currency, smart contract, electronic trading. Identified were both doctrinal and practical problems associated with the essence and features of those elements, as well as the legal regulation of the associated relations. Those elements are considered in two dimensions, in the information system and legal field. In addition, significant gaps in the regulatory framework of the associated relations were identified; the impossibility of applying the classical regime of objects of civil rights and the rules of documentary circulation to digital objects and processes was substantiated. The novelty of the work consists in proposing ways to solve interdisciplinary theoretical and practical problems of the property turnover digitalisation, which are important for a wide range of academic researchers and practitioners in the legal field.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Property turnover digitalisation: Interdisciplinary problems of post-classical jurisprudence

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ethereum is not designed as non-state or apolitical money. It has a currency, called Ether, but this currency is functional and used to power small applications on Ethereum's distributed world computer (Bartoletti, 2020). Thus, while economic concerns are important, they don't dominate everything and can be overridden if it serves the public good.…”

Section: Ethereum Staking and The Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Teaching cryptocurrencies as cryptocultures

Dylan-Ennis

2021

JALT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, I discuss an approach to teaching cryptocurrencies as cryptocultures. Cryptocurrencies are traditionally approached as technical or financial phenomena, but I argue that for students outside those specialist areas, a cultural approach will orient them better. I encourage teachers to first focus on situating students in a place, a shared public commons inhabited by the community of a cryptocurrency. I offer a way to model this place using a hash, bash, cash model of decentralised organisation. I build on this sense of place by then revealing to students the cultural context of a cryptocurrency. The context is comprised of the social imaginaries and the overarching goal animating a cryptocurrency culture. I show how this cryptocultural approach can be used to analyse different cryptocultures through an examination of the competing environmental imaginaries of Bitcoin and Ethereum.

show abstract

“…The use of smart contracts has gained much recognition due to its ability to transfer assets in the form, mainly, of cryptocurrencies. Another relevant definition is given by [19] which conceptualizes smart contracts as programs that execute correctly without the intervention of a trusted authority and cites Ethereum as responsible for implementing the smart model contracts currently adopted and also the consensus model applied by it, which is very robust due to it's verification scheme that only allows registration in the blocks for transactions considered valid [20].…”

Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning

confidence: 99%