2012
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2011.645274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart Growth's Blind Side

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leigh et al 2014). Secondly, Green- Leigh and Hoelzel (2012) highlight the importance of discourse surrounding industrial land and moving from a deficit or nuisance frame to one of an asset.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Leigh et al 2014). Secondly, Green- Leigh and Hoelzel (2012) highlight the importance of discourse surrounding industrial land and moving from a deficit or nuisance frame to one of an asset.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code is distinct and protective-The code is in addition to the standard manufacturing zones and lists a stronger set of protections or limitations on uses of the land than is found in the standard codes 2. Industrial Land is an asset-The code does not frame industrial land as a nuisance but as an asset that is important for the local economy/job base I decided upon identifying separate and distinct policies as recent studies show that cities that do adopt industrial preservation policies often designate protected districts as opposed to increasing protections on all existing manufacturing land (N. G. Leigh and Hoelzel 2012;N. Leigh et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This chapter tries to move from the symbolic rhetoric of sustainability and its related axioms to hard and relevant data and information. This is useful in evaluating in practical terms the performance of plans and implementation efforts towards achieving sustainability, thus improving the ability and legitimacy of spatial planners in promoting the more holistic concept of sustainability (See Berke & Conroy, 2000: 31;and Leigh & Hoelzel, 2012). And since spatial planners play a key role in shaping and influencing the discussion about conceiving concrete public policy solutions related to -SG‖, the analysis provided hereinafter is based on extensive semi-structured interviews with planners from the policy community of Bethlehem (henceforth referred to as, respondents).…”
Section: 21scope Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%