Smart Justice in Italy: Cases of Apps Created by Lawyers for Lawyers and Beyond

Abstract

The smart city literature states that three levels of institutional layers (regulatory, normative, and cognitive) and four typologies of actors (government, universities, citizens, and the private sector) support private initiative for developing smart technologies. Focusing on the emergent phenomenon of smart apps ideated by lawyers’ private initiatives, this paper acknowledges that other factors, including the ubiquity of mobile technologies and the absence of effective public services provided by public institutions, contribute to the institutional and organizational humus necessary for the creation of intelligent technological proposals. In the light of the organizational theory framework, and based on the analysis of the literature on smart cities and e-justice and on the empirical investigation of two Italian lawyers’ apps (Collega and Anthea), this paper identifies the institutional, organizational, and technological conditions under which smart technologies are being developed in high-regulated public institutions’ contexts as justice systems. The findings of the study described in this paper help integrate the contribution of the literature on the topic.

My Human Rights Smart City: Improving Human Rights Transparency Identification System

“…The scenario for meeting the 2030 Agenda concerning fundamental human rights needs assistance from decision-making systems as there are already several software solutions that can help in the fight against human rights violations, such as Shmapped [13], Corona Warn App [14], LeaveHomeSafe [15], Collega [16], Posyandu Application [17], Dandarah App [18], and the Brazilian app "Linha Direta", which digitally work in one or more areas of human rights. The new applications are aligned with the global e-governance strategy, which can be monitored annually [19]; these solutions mainly serve people in situations of social vulnerability [20].…”

The Professional Conflict Pertaining to Confidentiality—The Obligation of Disclosure for Intermediaries of Financial Transactions

“…In summary, the social scientific research presents evidence of the fact that lawyering involves choice and that those choices are made within a context that includes rules, professional expectations, and personal values (Lupo and Carnevali 2022). These decisions are regularly made in what may be described as zones of discretion, choice, and justification that are inevitable features of the lawyer's role (Robertson and Tranter 2006).…”