“…The changes could develop great resistance which also results in tokenistic professionalism at best which is focused on functional convenience: Using an LMS as a digital depository and/or a bulletin board, offering self-learning activities, structuring a course based on one-to-many (an instructor-many individual students) interactions, and/or the absence of teacher presence in communication and collaboration (Dreamson, 2020 ; Brown et al, 2019 ; Park, 2011 ; Rapanta et al, 2020 ). These approaches could degenerate the underlying pedagogical strategies such as interactive learning (Anderson et al, 2001 ), personalised learning (Temdee, 2020 ), collaborative learning (Harasim, 2000 ), connectivist learning (Siemens, 2004 ), and smart learning (Khlaif & Farid, 2018 ). Inversely, the current hardship, even though it would not be long, offers opportunities for higher education to systematically and thoughtfully consider the identity changes.…”