Smart Monitoring and Assessment for Safe and Resilient Civil Infrastructure

Yun, Chung Bang; Lou, Yichao; Duan, Yuanfeng; Tang, Zhifeng

doi:10.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_88

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(2) When the city is already known as a resilient city, it then eventually needs the infrastructure for being smart as well (Baron, 2012;Roggema, 2020;Yun et al, 2020). By providing the smart foundations for a resilient city, it is then termed as SRC.…”

Section: Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Through the experimental method, the authors believe that RSC and SRC are two various frameworks with a different mission, depending on which theory preceded the other within the compositional narrative.As a smart city, it is vital to provide the resilience infrastructure for it (Abreu et al , 2017; Yoon, 2016; Zhu et al , 2019; De Falco et al , 2019; Haarstad and Wathne, 2019), sufficing resilient smart city (Zhu et al , 2019). When the city is already known as a resilient city, it then eventually needs the infrastructure for being smart as well (Baron, 2012; Roggema, 2020; Yun et al , 2020). By providing the smart foundations for a resilient city, it is then termed as SRC.…”

Section: Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The resilient – smart city development: a literature review and novel frameworks exploration

Khatibi

Wilkinson

Baghersad

et al. 2021

BEPAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper aims to develop a framework that could establish and further the terminology of smart city/resilient city discourse in that resilience could support urban “smartness”, a term that is widely argued being not easily measured nor quantifiably assessed.Design/methodology/approachThe qualitative approach was employed, and based on selected keywords, a systematic literature review was carried out to understand the main themes within the smart city and resilient city concepts databases. Upon screening, 86 papers were used and synthesised through the meta-synthesis method using both synthesis approach, meta-aggregation and meta-ethnography that systematically identifies both properties and characteristics, to build an innovative framework as an indicator-based smart/resilience quantification model.FindingsTwo novel frameworks are proposed, smart resilient city (SRC) and resilient smart city (RSC), as guidelines regulatory that establish a city's smartness and resilience.Research limitations/implicationsThe quantitative research phase is not provided as the framework builds on the exploratory approach in which the model is proposed through the postulation of data definitions.Practical implicationsAlthough the study's scope was limited to the city, proposed frameworks may be interpreted for other contexts that deal with the topic of resilience and smart.Originality/valueThe established framework proposal would encourage further exploration in context, serving as an inspiration for other scholars, decision-makers, as well as municipalities to keep strengthening smart city through resilience factors.

show abstract

Section: Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

The resilient – smart city development: a literature review and novel frameworks exploration

Khatibi

Wilkinson

Baghersad

et al. 2021

BEPAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Scholars have opined that as a smart city, it is vital to provide the resilience infrastructure for it (Zhu et al , 2019; Haarstad and Wathne, 2019; De Falco et al , 2019; Yoon, 2016; Javanmardi et al , 2016), in which a city can be identified as a resilient smart city. Similarly, when the city is already recognised as a resilient city, it eventually needs the infrastructure for being smart (Roggema, 2020; Yun et al , 2020; Baron, 2012). Providing the Smart foundations for an established resilient city is then proposed to achieve a smart resilient city's standards.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Indicators bank for smart and resilient cities: design of excellence

Khatibi

Wilkinson

Dianat

et al. 2021

BEPAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe study aims to use DfX to develop a comprehensive database of smart and resilient indicators that assists city administrators and authorities alike. The Smart and Resilient Cities Indicators Bank (SRCIB) will identify the level of smart and resilience determinants that will simultaneously provide ways to improve the city's infrastructure to meet smart and resilient objectives.Design/methodology/approachDesign of excellence (DfX) is adopted in dissecting from four best indicators of established systems, and a database of indicators is developed and specified in diverse ways. A new indicator system is then created for smart and resilient cities.FindingsThe proposed indicator bank consists of four layers consisting of dimension, sub-dimension, key issues and the number of indicators resulting from four different indicator systems that the study have analysed.Research limitations/implicationsThe proposed indicator bank is an exploratory approach that needs to be tested in a real scenario because the urban systems are complex inter-related systems with too many variables that may influence actual outcomes. Thus, the proposed indicators bank does not attempt to quantify or solve related urban issues commonly address in smart and resilient city concepts but more to enhance the management of attaining towards smart and resilient specifications.Practical implicationsThe proposed indicator bank is an exploratory approach that needs to be tested in a real scenario because the urban systems are complex inter-related systems with too many variables that may influence actual outcomes. Thus, the proposed indicators bank does not attempt to quantify or solve related urban issues commonly address smart and resilient city concepts but more to enhance the management of attaining smart and resilient specifications.Originality/valueThe study builds a robust guide for assessing smart and resilient cities that is yet a widely accessible assessment framework. The proposed SRCIB allows local authorities and relevant stakeholders of typical cities to better manage its urban agenda towards smart and resilient city objectives when specific indicators are defined. Besides, a smart city can become resilient; likewise, a resilient city can become smart as the SRCIB is comprehensive.

show abstract

Smart Monitoring and Assessment for Safe and Resilient Civil Infrastructure

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

The resilient – smart city development: a literature review and novel frameworks exploration

The resilient – smart city development: a literature review and novel frameworks exploration

Indicators bank for smart and resilient cities: design of excellence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About