2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart numerical method for calculation of simple general infrared parameter identifying binary rubber blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characteristic absorbance peak height of the oil at (723 cm −1 ) [ 22 ] was determined at a distance, as = 3 mm from the edge of the sample (the edge taken as 0 from the positive direction of x axis as is shown in Figure 2 ), on the two newly generated surfaces. For quantifying the peak heights, the spectrum for each sample was modified with an algorithm of baseline subtraction [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristic absorbance peak height of the oil at (723 cm −1 ) [ 22 ] was determined at a distance, as = 3 mm from the edge of the sample (the edge taken as 0 from the positive direction of x axis as is shown in Figure 2 ), on the two newly generated surfaces. For quantifying the peak heights, the spectrum for each sample was modified with an algorithm of baseline subtraction [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the results from all the programmes are shown as the work was focused more on the IR technique to find the initial and also on the redistributed concentration of the oil. Figure 4 , divided into four parts (a), (b), (c), and (d), according to the four initial oil concentrations of 0.0, 4.5, 9.0, and 13.5 phr, respectively, presents the baseline subtracted IR spectra for SBR at 699 cm −1 and for the redistributed paraffin oil at 2915 cm −1 after rupture [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In each sub-part of the figure, only one spectrum is shown at random from a repetition of three (as stated in the experimental part) for each of the following rupturing programmes– at), (I)-10, (II)-100, and (III)-500 mm·mim −1 (tensile ruptured) and (IV)- 0 mm·min −1 (cryo-ruptured).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the three repetitions for each of the samples, at each deformation speed, the arithmetic means concentration from the two generated ruptured surfaces was reported as the redistributed oil concentration. To quantify the peak heights, the spectrum for each sample was modified with an algorithm of baseline subtraction [ 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spectra were of limited use in understanding the active participation of the dangling vinyl groups in photocrosslinking as they were not baseline subtracted. Thus, baseline subtraction was done by using an algorithm of baseline fitting and subsequent subtraction [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The baseline subtracted spectra of the same selected samples in the wavenumber range of 1050 and 680 cm −1 are presented in Figure 9 a,b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra were obtained at a resolution of 4 cm −1 using a zinc selenide crystal. The data obtained from the spectrometer were then fed in an algorithm of baseline creation and subsequent subtraction [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] to quantify the disappearance of the vinyl pendant groups showing peak at 909 cm −1 [ 24 ], which actively participated in the photocrosslinking process. The quantification was done against normalized peak of polybutadiene unit at 965 cm −1 [ 24 ] of the SBS block copolymer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%