2012 IEEE 30th VLSI Test Symposium (VTS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/vts.2012.6231074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart selection of indirect parameters for DC-based alternate RF IC testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we will also comment the use of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) which is not strictly speaking a feature selection method but rather a dimensionality reduction technique. Despite of this, the reason why we include it into this study is because it is a widely-used preprocessing step in machine-learning and has actually been applied to Alternate Test [18].…”
Section: The Filtering Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we will also comment the use of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) which is not strictly speaking a feature selection method but rather a dimensionality reduction technique. Despite of this, the reason why we include it into this study is because it is a widely-used preprocessing step in machine-learning and has actually been applied to Alternate Test [18].…”
Section: The Filtering Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite clear that a set of alternate measurements to be used for binning purposes has to satisfy two main properties: (1) the measurements need to reflect circuit's performances variability in order to allow the binning to be performed efficiently and (2) an adequate set of measurements should not be redundant to avoid incurring in extra binning costs [31]- [33]. The first condition is achieved by means of a sensitivity analysis of candidate alternate measurements.…”
Section: B Alternate Measurements Selection Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors influence this efficiency such as the choice of adequate indirect parameters, the choice of the prediction model, the order of mapping between indirect measurements and device specifications, or the size and composition of the training set. The objective of this talk is to discuss various statistical methods for the choice of adequate indirect measurements [4]- [7], pertaining to both filter and wrapper categories in the field of feature selection. Their impact on alternate test efficiency will be evaluated in terms of model and prediction accuracy by using classical metrics such as average and maximal errors, but also in term of prediction reliability by introducing a new metric called Failing Prediction Rate (FPR).…”
Section: Statistical Techniques and Metrics For Alternate Testing mentioning
confidence: 99%