2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smarter greener cities through a social-ecological-technological systems approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been successful initiatives and failed projects [21]. Until the late 1980s, the Soviet Union's innovation system was one of the two most prolific invention systems on the planet, attributed to institutional experiments [23]. The height of Russian inventiveness occurred during the Soviet era [21].…”
Section: The Russian Innovation Parallaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been successful initiatives and failed projects [21]. Until the late 1980s, the Soviet Union's innovation system was one of the two most prolific invention systems on the planet, attributed to institutional experiments [23]. The height of Russian inventiveness occurred during the Soviet era [21].…”
Section: The Russian Innovation Parallaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SETS literature is growing rapidly, and includes scholarship on the relationship between urban SETS and disturbance (Grimm et al 2017 ; Lugo 2019 , 2020 ), the use of SETS to reduce urban flood risk (Chang et al 2021 ), enhancing positive SETS feedbacks to address heat- and drought-induced stresses on urban ecosystems (Wellmann et al 2023 ), the governance and environmental justice implications of urban SETS (Pineda-Pinto et al 2021 ; Krueger et al 2022 ), and the multifunctional ecosystem services provided by SETS (McPhearson et al 2022 ). Branny et al ( 2022 ) drew on this literature to present a systems approach for "smarter, greener" cities that utilizes SETS-based integrated solutions rather than more traditional, single-dimensional, technology-heavy solutions. Chester et al ( 2020 ) made a strong case for the vulnerability of exclusively engineered infrastructure in the face of a future of uncertainty.…”
Section: Box 2: the Bronx River Alliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scenario and future visioning development exercise used the SETS conceptual framework to guide visioning processes, including ensuring that all participants considered social, ecological, and technological aspects of both challenges and solutions. Additionally, taking the systems approach forward meant examining SETS couplings (McPhearson et al 2021 ; Branny et al 2022 ). This meant examining the social–ecological (S–E), social–technological (S–T), and ecological–technological (E–T) dimensions, dynamics, and feedbacks of climate impacts and deep future solutions (Fig.…”
Section: Box 3: New York City’s Climate Adaptation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart solutions in a holistic systems framework can generally align with sustainability and extend to fairness, power, agency, nature-based solutions, ecological resilience, etc. [6]. Smart building systems ease and comfort environmental, social and economic systems.…”
Section: Topic Importancementioning
confidence: 99%