2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI): Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
64
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was not possible to compare the cut-off point established in the Spanish version of the SPAI with the versions of the instrument in other languages, since we have only found one work in which it has been proposed to establish this cut-off point, in the short version of the instrument, which consists of only 10 items, instead of the original instrument's 26 [29]. In the other versions of the SPAI, such as the Brazilian, the Turkish or the Italian one, the establishment of said cut-off point was not considered [30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not possible to compare the cut-off point established in the Spanish version of the SPAI with the versions of the instrument in other languages, since we have only found one work in which it has been proposed to establish this cut-off point, in the short version of the instrument, which consists of only 10 items, instead of the original instrument's 26 [29]. In the other versions of the SPAI, such as the Brazilian, the Turkish or the Italian one, the establishment of said cut-off point was not considered [30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPAI has already been validated in Italian [ 50 ] and Brazilian [ 51 ] -the SPAI-I and SPAI-BR, respectively-. The authors of the SPAI-I confirmed the original model, but goodness-of-fit indices were ambiguous and so, they chose a five-factor model (comprising time spent , compulsivity , daily life interference , craving , and sleep interference ) to obtain the following fit indices (χ 2 68 = 118.834; p < 0.000; CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.05; and SRMR = 0.87).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are specific advantages to using factor analysis in this study: many variables are consolidated into a few key variables for easy interpretation, and the weight for each key variable can be relatively accurately calculated to produce for each ward and Chome [ 29 ]. Next, the main equations in the factor analysis, reorganized according to [ 30 , 31 ], are as follows: where is the determination principle coefficient of each used category in the linear combination. is the principal component load, and is the principal component eigenvalues.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%