Smartphone Apps Targeting Alcohol and Illicit Substance Use: Systematic Search in in Commercial App Stores and Critical Content Analysis

Abstract

Background Smartphone apps promise to enhance the reach of evidence-based interventions (cognitive behavior therapy, contingency management and therapeutic education system) for populations with substance use disorders, with minimal disruption to health systems. However, further studies are needed to systematically evaluate smartphone apps targeting alcohol and illicit substances. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the functionality, aesthetics, and quality of information of free or low-cost apps claiming to target alcohol, benzodiazepine, cocaine, crack/cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and heroin use using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and critical content analysis. Methods A systematic search of iTunes and Google Play app stores for free or low-cost apps facilitating recovery was conducted in March 2018 and yielded 904 apps using the keywords described in previous studies (eg, recovery, sobriety, sober, alcohol, and heroin). An interdisciplinary team of clinicians, behavioral informatics, and public health reviewers trained in substance use disorders conducted a descriptive analysis of 74 apps categorized as reducing use. In addition to the MARS scale, a descriptive analysis of relevant apps was conducted by the study team to assess for quality indicators emphasized by expert guidelines and review articles. Results Most apps (n=74) claimed to reduce use or promote abstinence and yielded an overall low median MARS score of 2.82 (0.55) and a wide range of scores (1.64, 4.20). Ratings were also low for engagement (2.75 (0.72)), functionality (3.64 (0.78)), aesthetics (3.03 (0.87)), information (2.82 (0.62)), and satisfaction (1.76 (0.67)) subdomains. Innovative design and content features elicited in the review included initial assessments of substance use following app download, tracking substance use, and related consequences (eg, cost or calorie intake), remote and proximate peer support per geospatial positioning, and allowing users and family members of individuals with substance use disorders to locate 12-step meetings, treatment programs, and mental health services. Few apps integrated evidence-based psychotherapeutic (eg, cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT] or motivational interviewing) and pharmacologic interventions (eg, naloxone or buprenorphine). Conclusions Few commercially available apps yielded in our search integrated evidence-based interventions (eg, extended-release naltrexone, buprenorphine, naloxone, Self-Management and Recovery Training recovery, or CBT), and a concerning number of apps promoted harmful drinking and illicit substance use.

Testing the efficacy of a minimal-guidance online self-help intervention for alcohol misuse in Estonia: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

“…Our goals are to achieve maximum attention in the general population of Estonia and reach as many individuals from the target group as possible, similar to a recent screening and brief intervention Website [7] with most of those in the target population having never received any prior alcohol treatment at all. Most similar programs that were introduce in other countries have had to compete with other already-existing internet programs for the reduction of alcohol misuse, among which most likely had never been evaluated for efficacy, and most lacked evidence-based therapeutic content [26]. Thus, we expect somewhat higher intervention adherence as observed in similar studies in other countries [10,12].…”

Ethische Aspekte internet- und mobilgestützter Interventionen (IMIs) bei Suchtstörungen

“…Dabei gibt es eine große Varianz hinsichtlich der Evidenzbasierung und generell der Qualität. Tofighi et al [35] fanden in ihrer Studie, dass nur 7 von 74 getesteten kommerziellen Apps auf empirischen Studienergebnissen basieren. Des Weiteren müssen besonders bei kommerziellen Anwendungen Anforderungen hinsichtlich Vertraulichkeit und Informed Consent überdacht werden [15].…”

Virtuelle Medizin in der Behandlung von Sucht in den USA, Kanada und darüber hinaus

“…Sie wird v. a. außerhalb des klinischen und wissenschaft-lichen Bereichs von IT Startups betrieben. Die Zahl derjenigen Lösungen, die sich behaupten und wissenschaftlich von unabhängigen Experten evaluiert werden, ist dagegen klein [7]. Das mag sich mit den neuen gesetzlichen Rahmenbedingungen, insbesondere der neuen Finanzierungsmöglichkeiten durch die Kassen in Deutschland verändern (REF DIGA) 2 .…”