2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-09571-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphone-based bulky waste classification using convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the existing detectors cannot extract adequate features at precise target areas, some researchers deepen and broaden network structures to improve the efficiency of feature extraction (Dang et al, 2021;H. Wang et al, 2020;Q.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that the existing detectors cannot extract adequate features at precise target areas, some researchers deepen and broaden network structures to improve the efficiency of feature extraction (Dang et al, 2021;H. Wang et al, 2020;Q.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it is challenging for the existing extractors to precisely obtain complete target areas, especially when processing images with complex backgrounds. To make the model pay more attention to the objective region, a great effort has been put into acquiring more valuable features by deepening and broadening feature extractors in previous studies (Dang et al, 2021;H. Wang et al, 2020;Q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the recent advancements in ML, both the scientific community and industry have attempted to apply ML-based pattern recognition in various areas, such as agriculture [ 32 ], resource management [ 33 ], and construction [ 34 ]. At present, many types of defect classification algorithms have been presented for both binary and multi-class classification tasks.…”
Section: Defect Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies used three CNN architectures for classification: MobileNetV2 had a classification accuracy of 96.27 percent, ResNet34 96.273 percent, DenseNet121 96.42 percent [25] , VGG-19 86.19 percent, ResNet50 79.63 percent, and Inception-V3 81.15 percent [26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%