2015 15th International Conference on Innovations for Community Services (I4CS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/i4cs.2015.7294490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphone-based networks for earthquake detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ground motions recorded around the trigger time are also stored in the database for further analysis. The system architecture is described in Kong et al (2015). Four existing ML algorithms are running in the MyShake system shown in Figure 1, which are summarized in the following two subsections.…”
Section: Current Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground motions recorded around the trigger time are also stored in the database for further analysis. The system architecture is described in Kong et al (2015). Four existing ML algorithms are running in the MyShake system shown in Figure 1, which are summarized in the following two subsections.…”
Section: Current Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once in this "steady state, " the ANN classifies subsequent motion into earthquakelike or human-like types and any earthquake-type parameters are sent to the backend cloud server for aggregation with readings from other nearby devices using spatial and clustering algorithm (Kong et al, 2018c,d). In addition, MyShake uploads 5 min of acceleration time-series data from phones in the area of a detected quake, which are archived for research purposes (Kong et al, 2015).…”
Section: Citizen Science Data and Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental monitoring becomes increasingly sensor dense and real time, supported through advances in technology and a variety of inexpensive (geo)sensors. Geosensor networks are deployed in various environments, such as urban observation (Mead et al, 2013;Murty et al, 2008;Resch, Mittlboeck, Girardin, Britter, & Ratti, 2009;Sanchez et al, 2011;Xiao et al, 2017), smart forests (Zhong, Kealy, Sharon, & Duckham, 2015), precision agriculture (Agrible, Inc., 2016), earthquake monitoring (Faulkner et al, 2011;Hudnut, Bock, Galetzka, Webb, & Young, 2002;Kong et al, 2015), or radiation monitoring (Safecast, 2016). The geosensors of a network, mobile or stationary, sample concurrently and often at high temporal frequency; geosensor networks in smart cities, emergency monitoring or precision agriculture, can reach up to millions of concurrently sampling sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%