Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Measurement for Screening and Clinical Assessment

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Visual acuity is the most frequently performed measure of visual function in clinical practice and most people worldwide living with visual impairment are living in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE To design and validate a smartphone-based visual acuity test that is not dependent on familiarity with symbols or letters commonly used in the English language. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Validation study conducted from December 11, 2013, to March 4, 2014, comparing results from smartphone-based Peek Acuity to Snellen acuity (clinical normal) charts and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) logMAR chart (reference standard). This study was nested within the 6-year follow-up of the Nakuru Eye Disease Cohort in central Kenya and included 300 adults aged 55 years and older recruited consecutively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Outcome measures were monocular logMAR visual acuity scores for each test: ETDRS chart logMAR, Snellen acuity, and Peek Acuity. Peek Acuity was compared, in terms of test-retest variability and measurement time, with the Snellen acuity and ETDRS logMAR charts in participants’ homes and temporary clinic settings in rural Kenya in 2013 and 2014. RESULTS The 95%CI limits for test-retest variability of smartphone acuity data were ±0.029 logMAR. The mean differences between the smartphone-based test and the ETDRS chart and the smartphone-based test and Snellen acuity data were 0.07 (95%CI, 0.05–0.09) and 0.08 (95%CI, 0.06–0.10) logMAR, respectively, indicating that smartphone-based test acuities agreed well with those of the ETDRS and Snellen charts. The agreement of Peek Acuity and the ETDRS chart was greater than the Snellen chart with the ETDRS chart (95%CI, 0.05–0.10; P = .08). The local Kenyan community health care workers readily accepted the Peek Acuity smartphone test; it required minimal training and took no longer than the Snellen test (77 seconds vs 82 seconds; 95%CI, 71–84 seconds vs 73–91 seconds, respectively; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The study demonstrated that the Peek Acuity smartphone test is capable of accurate and repeatable acuity measurements consistent with published data on the test-retest variability of acuities measured using 5-letter-per-line retroilluminated logMAR charts.

Tecnologia para realização do autoexame ocular: comparação entre cartilha impressa e virtual

“…In view of the above, educational interventions mediated by light technologies such as the booklet for ocular self-examination can promote positive screening behaviors and is a viable strategy that must be incorporated into nursing care in any care setting. Thus, screenings using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) represent a strategy that tends to radically change the panorama of late detection of visual impairments (9) . Therefore, it is essential that materials address guidelines on eye health at accessible reading levels, both in the printed and the online versions (4) .…”

Evaluation of the self-eye examination method for health promotion

“…It is useful for identifying ocular problems in several situations, not only clinical but also traumatic (27) . A study recently developed in India reached the conclusion on the possibility of promoting behavior changes when these include simple information and without involvement of complex procedures or those interfering with cultural beliefs (28) . Therefore, the need for information on ocular health justifies the efforts for greater possibility of access to knowledge about ocular self-care promotion.…”

Utilisation and perceptions towards smart device visual acuity assessment in Australia: a mixed methods approach

“…Visual acuity (VA) is the most commonly performed measure of visual function globally 1. Clinically, VA assessment is important to quantify changes in vision over time and is a good predictor of the presence of refractive error 2.…”

“…Clinically, VA assessment is important to quantify changes in vision over time and is a good predictor of the presence of refractive error 2. Additionally, in research settings, VA is a critical measure to assess the efficacy of therapies in clinical trials and to quantify the burden of vision impairment and blindness in population-based studies 1…”

“…The retro-illuminated LogMAR acuity chart overcomes these limitations and is currently considered to be the gold standard in vision assessment. Despite this, the LogMAR chart has not been widely adopted for clinical use, which is likely due to a longer testing speed required, larger chart size and cost 1…”