2015
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphone Image Acquisition During Postmortem Monocular Indirect Ophthalmoscopy

Abstract: The medical usefulness of smartphones continues to evolve as third-party applications exploit and expand on the smartphones' interface and capabilities. This technical report describes smartphone still-image capture techniques and video-sequence recording capabilities during postmortem monocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. Using these devices and techniques, practitioners can create photographic documentation of fundal findings, clinically and at autopsy, without the expense of a retinal camera. Smartphone image … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And for good reason: this invasive method has been used by few operators and is limited by the need of an endoscope that is barely used in daily practice in forensic pathology and ophthalmology. Indirect ophthalmoscopy associated with smartphone image acquisition has been previously described but the “do it yourself” association of smartphone and lens is not ergonomic and requires training and practice to be performed correctly [ 13 ]. Moreover, no case series has been shown, and data regarding the image quality with indirect ophthalmoscopy is lacking: in our personal experience, post-mortem indirect ophthalmoscopy is difficult, frequently limited by opacification of cornea and lens, whereas visibility is better with a contact camera such as the RetCam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And for good reason: this invasive method has been used by few operators and is limited by the need of an endoscope that is barely used in daily practice in forensic pathology and ophthalmology. Indirect ophthalmoscopy associated with smartphone image acquisition has been previously described but the “do it yourself” association of smartphone and lens is not ergonomic and requires training and practice to be performed correctly [ 13 ]. Moreover, no case series has been shown, and data regarding the image quality with indirect ophthalmoscopy is lacking: in our personal experience, post-mortem indirect ophthalmoscopy is difficult, frequently limited by opacification of cornea and lens, whereas visibility is better with a contact camera such as the RetCam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance and the protocol of post-mortem eye removal as part of the autopsy have been well described [ 10 ]. Conversely, reports of post-mortem fundus examination are very rare and no protocol has been yet validated between endoscopy [ 11 , 12 ] or indirect ophthalmoscopy [ 13 ]. Wide field fundus camera such as RetCam (Clarity Medical Systems USA) is the gold standard for the acquisition of retinal images in suspected cases of AHT in living children [ 14 ], but this method has never been described in deceased children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe this case report contains the first published photographs of distinctive RAE associated with fatal systemic (paradoxical) AE. These compelling retinal findings emphasize the value and importance of consistent, timely, and thorough postmortem ophthalmoscopy [78–81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postmortem monocular indirect ophthalmoscopy permits detection of RHs in a decedent's posterior fundus and portions of the peripheral retina (56,57). Adherence to valid scientific principles and documentation of the full spectrum of pediatric conditions associated with RHs is essential because comparative studies concluding that RHs are specific to abuse involve combinations of data gatherers not blinded to the participants or the study hypothesis, incorporation bias (circularity), selection bias, information bias, or misrepresentation of data (58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%