Background
The purpose of the present study was to microscopically evaluate the influence of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, manual dynamic, and conventional methods on smear layer removal of different NaOCl solutions at the apical, middle, and coronal regions of root canal walls.
Methods
One hundred & eight freshly extracted human single-canal anterior teeth were enrolled in this study. The teeth were decapitated & their canals were instrumented to size X4, 0.06 taper using rotary files of ProTaper Next® system. According to type of agitation technique, the teeth were classified into three groups (36 teeth each); no activation (traditional), manual dynamic, & Er,Cr:YSGG laser-activated techniques. Each group were further subdivided into four subgroups based on the irrigant type & concentration (n = 9); saline and 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% NaOCl. Samples were gently split, longitudinally for SEM evaluation. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.
Results
Regardless the irrigant type & concentration, Er,Cr:YSGG Laser-activated & manual dynamic groups showed better smear layer removal values than that of conventional group.
Conclusion
Er,Cr:YSGG laser-activated irrigation can eliminates more smear layer compared manual dynamic, & conventional techniques which increasing the cleaning capacity of different root canal irrigants.