1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90142-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smear removal agents: A quantitative study in vivo and in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
4

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that the hydrostatic pulpal pressure, the dentinal fluid flow and the increased dentinal wetness in vital dentin can affect the intimate interaction of certain dentin adhesives with dentinal tissue. [32][33][34] These findings are supported by studies that demonstrated low bond strength 35 Hannig and Friedrichs also observed that a completely gap-free adaptation between composite and dentin could not be achieved reproducibly and consistently, either in vivo or in vitro, in cavities with a high C-factor. 36 They found that Prime & Bond 2.1 gave better results when applied in vitro, as compared to in vivo restorations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It has been suggested that the hydrostatic pulpal pressure, the dentinal fluid flow and the increased dentinal wetness in vital dentin can affect the intimate interaction of certain dentin adhesives with dentinal tissue. [32][33][34] These findings are supported by studies that demonstrated low bond strength 35 Hannig and Friedrichs also observed that a completely gap-free adaptation between composite and dentin could not be achieved reproducibly and consistently, either in vivo or in vitro, in cavities with a high C-factor. 36 They found that Prime & Bond 2.1 gave better results when applied in vitro, as compared to in vivo restorations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…EDTA: 17% EDTA at the apical third, 2,000Â; citric: 42% citric acid at the apical third, 2,000Â; MTAD: MTAD at the apical third, 2,000Â; and control: control group at the apical third, 2,000Â. apical third although erosive effects of EDTA and citric acid have been reported in several studies (12,31,(39)(40)(41). BioPure MTAD is comparatively more aggressive in demineralizing intact intraradicular dentin and was able to expose collagen matrices 1.5 to 2 times as thick as those produced with EDTA (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDTA has been shown to remove smear layer to expose the dentin matrix (21,22) and also appears not to damage stem cells (23). Dentin matrix was exposed to allow the mesenchymal stem cells to interact with dentin matrix that might help differentiate into odontoblast-like cells.…”
Section: Effects Of Demineralization and Exposure Of Dentin Matrixmentioning
confidence: 97%