2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56904-8_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smell and Meaning: An OERP Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the Task, the experimenter asked the subject if he had perceived the smell and if he perceived the odour, and if the odour was pleasant, arousing or familiar on a scale from 1 to 5 (i.e., 1 = minimum value; 5 = maximum value) [53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the Task, the experimenter asked the subject if he had perceived the smell and if he perceived the odour, and if the odour was pleasant, arousing or familiar on a scale from 1 to 5 (i.e., 1 = minimum value; 5 = maximum value) [53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device used to record odorous stimuli presentation allows the CSERPs evoked by olfactory stimuli to be measured in a controlled, automated fashion, synchronized to the acquisition of the EEG signal. This method additionally allowed for the blind presentation of smells ( Invitto et al, 2014 , 2017b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the odor is administered, the subject automatically searches, even if the task does not require it, to label the various smells perceived (naming action) [46], thus producing different ERP components depending on the encoding of the stimulus or the level of discrimination and recognition [47]. Even using new or scarcely known smells could cause the same inconvenience as the subject tries to identify them.…”
Section: Methods Of Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%