2006
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2005.864354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMES for Electric Power Compensation of the J-PARC High Intensity Proton Synchrotron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A four solenoid coils configuration with opposite polarities is proposed as shown in Fig. 6, although we proposed the Force-Balanced Coil SMES formerly [6]. At the design, the parameters were fixed as that the maximum magnetic flux density was 5.0T with the Rutherford type Nb-Ti conductor and the height of coil was twice the diameter.…”
Section: Design Of Distributed Smes Coil Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A four solenoid coils configuration with opposite polarities is proposed as shown in Fig. 6, although we proposed the Force-Balanced Coil SMES formerly [6]. At the design, the parameters were fixed as that the maximum magnetic flux density was 5.0T with the Rutherford type Nb-Ti conductor and the height of coil was twice the diameter.…”
Section: Design Of Distributed Smes Coil Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During phase-1, the synchrotron will be operated with the energy of 30 GeV or 40GeV. With the 40GeV operation, the total amounts of active power and dissipation power becomes about +58.8 MW --38 8. MW in peak, and 14.2 MW, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. At this present, SMES ((Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage) is under consideration to make a power stabilization in stead of FW[8] to aim the upgrade in phase II of J-PARC. Schematic of the QFP magnet power supply circuit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%