2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.02339
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMIM: a unified framework of Survival sensitivity analysis using Multiple Imputation and Martingale

Abstract: Censored survival data are common in clinical trial studies. We propose a unified framework for sensitivity analysis to censoring at random in survival data using multiple imputation and martingale, called SMIM. The proposed framework adopts the δ-adjusted and control-based models, indexed by the sensitivity parameter, entailing censoring at random and a wide collection of censoring not at random assumptions. Also, it targets for a broad class of treatment effect estimands defined as functionals of treatment-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, we define the average treatment effect (ATE) measure θ τ as a function of treatmentspecific survival curves, θ τ = Ψ τ (S 1 (t), S 0 (t)) where τ is a pre-specified constant. This formulation of the ATE includes a broad class of estimands that are favored in survival analysis (Yang et al, 2020). For example, θ τ = S 1 (τ ) − S 0 (τ ) is a simple survival difference at a fixed time τ , and…”
Section: Notation and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, we define the average treatment effect (ATE) measure θ τ as a function of treatmentspecific survival curves, θ τ = Ψ τ (S 1 (t), S 0 (t)) where τ is a pre-specified constant. This formulation of the ATE includes a broad class of estimands that are favored in survival analysis (Yang et al, 2020). For example, θ τ = S 1 (τ ) − S 0 (τ ) is a simple survival difference at a fixed time τ , and…”
Section: Notation and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Yang et al (2020), we consider an asymptotic linear characterization of the ATE estimator θ ACW τ = Ψ τ S ACW 1 (t), S ACW 0 (t) for both ACW1 and ACW2 estimators. That is, under mild regularity conditions,…”
Section: Augmented Calibration Weighting Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation