1995
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320580317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smith‐Magenis syndrome deletion: A case with equivocal cytogenetic findings resolved by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Abstract: The availability of markers for the 17p11.2 region has enabled the diagnosis of Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). SMS is typically associated with a discernible deletion of band 17p11.2 upon cytogenetic analysis at a resolution of 400-550 bands. We present a case that illustrates the importance of using FISH to confirm a cytogenetic diagnosis of del(17)(p11.2). Four independent cytogenetic analyses were performed with different conclusions. Results of low resolution ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases studied, the 1 7~1 1 . 2 deletion is visible on routine cytogenetic analysis; however, the molecular cytogenetic tech-nique-FISH-can be implemented to detect submicroscopic deletions (<2 megabases), verify a diagnosis of mosaicism, and detect deletions on suboptimal or low-resolution preparations [Chen et al, 1995;Juyal et al, 1995aJuyal et al, , 1995b Certainly, molecular cytogenetic analysis should be performed on any patient with a normal routine cytogenetic analysis in whom the diagnosis of SMS is strongly suspected. As clinicians become more familiar with the SMS phenotype, perhaps more individuals with submicroscopic deletions will be identified.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most cases studied, the 1 7~1 1 . 2 deletion is visible on routine cytogenetic analysis; however, the molecular cytogenetic tech-nique-FISH-can be implemented to detect submicroscopic deletions (<2 megabases), verify a diagnosis of mosaicism, and detect deletions on suboptimal or low-resolution preparations [Chen et al, 1995;Juyal et al, 1995aJuyal et al, , 1995b Certainly, molecular cytogenetic analysis should be performed on any patient with a normal routine cytogenetic analysis in whom the diagnosis of SMS is strongly suspected. As clinicians become more familiar with the SMS phenotype, perhaps more individuals with submicroscopic deletions will be identified.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient did have many features of SMS, however, and thus is included in this review. Two affected children with apparent chromosomal mosaicism were subsequently found to be nonmosaic by FISH analysis [Finucane et al, 1993b;Juyal et al, 1995a. By molecular analysis, the deletion in these patients is smaller than the common SMS deletion; therefore, the SMS critical region is defined by the smaller deletion Duyal et al, 1996al. Currently, there is only one SMS patient reported who appears mosaic for the 1 7~1 1 .…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deletions are of both maternal and paternal origin, and although data suggest there is a slight maternal origin bias, imprinting does not appear to play a role in the phenotype [38]. Some reports suggest that smaller deletions (<2 Mb) may be undetectable or ambiguously detected by standard cytogenetic methods and require the use of FISH for diagnosis [41,42], and current recommendations include FISH with an RAI1-containing probe for proper diagnosis of SMS [28].…”
Section: Genetic Diagnosis Of Smith-magenis Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This DOE project also supported the following additional collaborations involving similar studies: (a) identification of YACs spanning breakpoints in two incontinentia pigmentosi type I patients and discrimination between these breakpoints using cosmid subclones (Gorski et al, 1996); (c) confirmation of a deletion of PMP22 in hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (Rao et al, 1993); (3) demonstration that a recessive form of CMTlA is caused by deletion of one allele and point mutation in the other (ibid. ); (f) positioning of YACs relative to 18q-deletions Hui et al, 1995); (g) resolution of an equivocal deletion in a Smith-Magenis syndrome patient by FISH (Juyal et al, 1995); and (h) mapping YACs and BACs relative to overlapping deletions in patients with Williams' syndrome (discussed further below; manuscript in preparation). These diverse studies were only possible because of effective reduction-to-routine practice in the range of FISH techniques.…”
Section: Organization Of Chromatinmentioning
confidence: 99%