2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.15.456423
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMOG 2 and OpenSMOG: Extending the limits of structure-based models

Abstract: Applying simulations with structure-based (Go-like) models has proven to be an effective strategy for investigating the factors that control biomolecular dynamics. The common element of these models is that some (or all) of the intra/inter-molecular interactions are explicitly defined to stabilize an experimentally-determined structure. To facilitate the development and application of this broad class of models, we previously released the SMOG 2 software package. This suite allows one to easily customize and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular dynamics was performed using the widely employed structure-based model (SBM), and proteins were coarse-grained in a C α atom level of simplification (Figure ). In this model, individual beads centered at the α carbon position are used to represent the residue atoms of proteins. The Hamiltonian equation that represents the protein beads interactions is constructed based on the geometry of the protein native structure, and this potential has its minimum at this reference state. The potential energy in a configuration Γ, calculated relative to the configuration of the native structure Γ o , is given by with ϵ r = 100ϵ C , ϵ θ = 20ϵ C , ϵ ϕ = ϵ C , and ϵ NC = ϵ C , in which ϵ C is the interaction energy per contact equal to 1.0 in reduced units. r , θ, and ϕ represent the distance between two subsequent residues, the angles formed by three and four subsequent residues of native structure, respectively.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular dynamics was performed using the widely employed structure-based model (SBM), and proteins were coarse-grained in a C α atom level of simplification (Figure ). In this model, individual beads centered at the α carbon position are used to represent the residue atoms of proteins. The Hamiltonian equation that represents the protein beads interactions is constructed based on the geometry of the protein native structure, and this potential has its minimum at this reference state. The potential energy in a configuration Γ, calculated relative to the configuration of the native structure Γ o , is given by with ϵ r = 100ϵ C , ϵ θ = 20ϵ C , ϵ ϕ = ϵ C , and ϵ NC = ϵ C , in which ϵ C is the interaction energy per contact equal to 1.0 in reduced units. r , θ, and ϕ represent the distance between two subsequent residues, the angles formed by three and four subsequent residues of native structure, respectively.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S12), and they can be performed effectively using modern GPU resources. 101 With these levels of performance, modest-sized compute clusters are sufficient to perform simulations that describe millisecond effective timescales for MDa-scale assemblies. Accordingly, it is now becoming feasible to explore the impact of ions on large-scale conformational rearrangements.…”
Section: Modeling the Factors That Control Biomolecular Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%