2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00779.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoke and Mirrors: Inverting the Discourse on Tobacco

Abstract: Understanding the mechanisms that construct and maintain the taken-for-granted, "common sense" understandings of everyday life is an essential prerequisite for reconfiguring conditions in more progressive directions. Highlighting particular moments, when these processes can be made visible, and drawing appropriate insights from such interrogations is useful not only for illuminating the fundamental malleability of "common sense" (itself a crucial element of change), but also for providing suggestive strategies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The section should canvas efforts produced through undergraduate and graduate pedagogy, through scholarly research and writing, and through the work of activists and practitioners on the ground. Highlighting this kind of translational work, including documentation and elucidation of moments when “common sense” was altered for progressive purposes (on this, see, for example, Waterstone, 2010), could produce new and unanticipated synergies and collaborations. Importantly, dedicated attention could also help to raise the status of such activity relative to the production of “new” knowledge.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The section should canvas efforts produced through undergraduate and graduate pedagogy, through scholarly research and writing, and through the work of activists and practitioners on the ground. Highlighting this kind of translational work, including documentation and elucidation of moments when “common sense” was altered for progressive purposes (on this, see, for example, Waterstone, 2010), could produce new and unanticipated synergies and collaborations. Importantly, dedicated attention could also help to raise the status of such activity relative to the production of “new” knowledge.…”
Section: A Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smokefree legislation exemplifies Valverde's point, as the dramatic changes to the smoking landscape over the past two decades have stemmed primarily from ordinances enacted at the municipal level. For example, using California as a case study, Waterstone (2010) illustrates the instrumental role of nonsmokers' rights groups in developing ordinances, and then utilizing local activists to work the political machinery in their communities to ensure their implementation. It was the enactment of hundreds of these local ordinances that eventually led to the implementation of statewide smokefree legislation (California Department of Health Services, 1998, p. 4)-a pattern that also occurred in Canada (Asbridge, 2004;Nykiforuk, Campbell, Cameron, Brown, & Eyles, 2007).…”
Section: Smoking Social Class and Public Spacementioning
confidence: 99%