Smoke, Curtains and Mirrors: The Production of Race Through Time and Title Registration

Abstract

ABSTRACT. This article analyses the temporal effects of title registration and their relationship to race. It traces the move away from the retrospection of pre-registry common law conveyancing and toward the dynamic, future-oriented Torrens title registration system. The Torrens system, developed in early colonial Australia, enabled the production of 'clean', fresh titles that were independent of their predecessors. Through a process praised by legal commentators for 'curing' titles of their pasts, this system produces indefeasible titles behind its distinctive 'curtain' and 'mirror', which function similarly to magicians' smoke and mirrors by blocking particular realities from view. In the case of title registries, those realities are particular histories of and relationships with land, which will not be protected by property law and are thus made precarious. Building on interdisciplinary work which theorises time as a social tool, I argue that Torrens title registration produces a temporal order which enables land market coordination by rendering some relationships with land temporary and making others indefeasible. This ordering of relationships with land in turn has consequences for the human subjects who have those relationships, cutting futures short for some and guaranteeing permanence to others. Engaging with Renisa Mawani and other critical race

Finance/security infrastructures

“…Chakrabarty (2011, p. 31) reminds us of the profound relation between colonialism and land property law, and how 'European colonialization proceeded on the basis of an imagination that took the political-economy category of 'land' for granted'. Sarah Keenan (2017) shows in detail how the law of title deeds 'functioned as a tool of colonial governance', and effectively worked to produce and dispossess racialized categories of indigenous populations (also Bhandar, 2018). Others point out that monetary reform was a key factor in colonial governance, bolstering economic control and seigniorage gains (Helleiner, 2002;Koddenbrock, 2020).…”

Law and Speed: Asylum Appeals and the Techniques and Consequences of Legal Quickening

“…This seminal intervention lays the groundwork for more recent socio-legal studies that examine the relationship between law and time, particularly from critical legal, 24 feminist, 25 or post-or anti-colonial perspectives. 26 Emily Grabham's analysis of what she calls 'legal times', for example, emphasizes the materiality that both constitutes and limits the law as such. 27 She proposes a renewed focus on objects in the study of law, arguing that omitting them from legal enquiry 'leads to an overestimation of law's power in the abstract … while underestimating its immediacy, specificity and concreteness in human relations'.…”

Crossing the boundaries of the home: a chronotopical analysis of the legal status of women's domestic work

“…However, the decision as to what type of labour justifies reward is inevitably tied to social conventions and beliefs as to what work is considered meritorious and valuable (Harris, 1999, p. 431). In English property law, the determination of whose labour merits reward has always been gendered, racialised and classed, and based around a White and male model of ownership (see Keenan, 2017). It has been established that preservation and maintenance do not have a sufficiently direct connection to the property to warrant an inference that it was intended that the claimant should have a share 20 .…”