Smoking and health-related quality of life in English general population: implications for economic evaluations

Abstract

BackgroundLittle is known as to how health-related quality of life (HRQoL) when measured by generic instruments such as EQ-5D differ across smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers in the general population; whether the overall pattern of this difference remain consistent in each domain of HRQoL; and what implications this variation, if any, would have for economic evaluations of tobacco control interventions.MethodsUsing the 2006 round of Health Survey for England data (n = 13,241), this paper aims to examine the impact of smoking status on health-related quality of life in English population. Depending upon the nature of the EQ-5D data (i.e. tariff or domains), linear or logistic regression models were fitted to control for biology, clinical conditions, socio-economic background and lifestyle factors that an individual may have regardless of their smoking status. Age- and gender-specific predicted values according to smoking status are offered as the potential 'utility' values to be used in future economic evaluation models.ResultsThe observed difference of 0.1100 in EQ-5D scores between never-smokers (0.8839) and heavy-smokers (0.7739) reduced to 0.0516 after adjusting for biological, clinical, lifestyle and socioeconomic conditions. Heavy-smokers, when compared with never-smokers, were significantly more likely to report some/severe problems in all five domains - mobility (67%), self-care (70%), usual activity (42%), pain/discomfort (46%) and anxiety/depression (86%) -. 'Utility' values by age and gender for each category of smoking are provided to be used in the future economic evaluations.ConclusionSmoking is significantly and negatively associated with health-related quality of life in English general population and the magnitude of this association is determined by the number of cigarettes smoked. The varying degree of this association, captured through instruments such as EQ-5D, may need to be fed into the design of future economic evaluations where the intervention being evaluated affects (e.g. tobacco control) or is affected (e.g. treatment for lung cancer) by individual's (or patients') smoking status.

The relationship between SF-6D utility scores and lifestyle factors across three life stages: evidence from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health

“…We found a consistent dose-response relationship between smoking status, determined by number of cigarettes smoked, and lower SF-6D utility score across the three cohorts, which were supported by previous research on the SF-6D [11 ], EQ-5D [40] and HRQoL [41]. Although these findings contrast other studies [14,15], the differences observed may be due to differences in the number of levels used to classify smoking patterns.…”

Advancing research data publishing practices for the social sciences: from archive activity to empowering researchers

“…For example, Poortinga et al [7] compared public perceptions of climate change and energy futures between Britain and Japan before and after the Fukushima accident, because of existing data from public perceptions surveys carried out in Britain and Japan before [8] and after [9] the accident. Vogl et al [10] show how data from the Health Survey for England [11] could be analysed to inform public health strategies, in particular providing evidence that smoking negatively affects healthrelated quality of life. Regarding research methods, Ogden and Cornwell [12] show by analysing 400 interview questions and their corresponding responses from 10 qualitative studies in the area of health that the richness of interview data can be predicted by open questions, being located later on in an interview and being framed in the present or past tense.…”

Nicotine preloading for smoking cessation: the Preloading RCT

“…84 Utility values based on current smoking status (current or former smoker) were derived from the Health Survey for England adjusted for relevant covariates including disease prevalence. 85 The EuroQol-5 Dimensions, a validated instrument for measuring health-related quality of life, was used for both sets of utility values and UK tariffs were used for calculating utility scores 86 (see Appendix 1, Table 38). …”