1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0194-5998(96)70117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking and Middle Ear Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in the age-group corresponding to the US study odds for internal ear diseases are similar (1.94, CI 1.24-3.04). For middle ear diseases there are very limited data among adults and studies are mainly confined in children that have evaluated harmful effects of second-hand smoke[3,4,17]. Adair-Bischoff et al[17] reported odds of 1.85 (CI 1.15-2.97) for children exposed to second-hand smoke by > 2 members of the household.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, in the age-group corresponding to the US study odds for internal ear diseases are similar (1.94, CI 1.24-3.04). For middle ear diseases there are very limited data among adults and studies are mainly confined in children that have evaluated harmful effects of second-hand smoke[3,4,17]. Adair-Bischoff et al[17] reported odds of 1.85 (CI 1.15-2.97) for children exposed to second-hand smoke by > 2 members of the household.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tobacco-induced negative effects on health include various types of cancers, heart disease, strokes, emphysema, and a slew of other serious (and often fatal) illnesses as observed in epidemiological and clinical studies[1,2]. Evidences have accumulated in recent years on the adverse effects of smoking and tobacco use on ear diseases and hearing among different population groups[3-10]. Some studies, on the other hand, have reported absence of such an association[11-13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…language literature; the ETS-MED association seems well accepted in some professional literature but denied in other literature. [14][15][16][17] As recently as March 1997, the ETS-MED relationship was found to be positive in about as many studies as it was found to be negative in. 17 This inconsistency in findings may be partly due to methodological issues, such as insufficient power, inadequate measurement of exposure and disease, lack of confounder control, and non-population-based study subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%