Smoking-Cessation Assistance: Before and After Stage 1 Meaningful Use Implementation

Abstract

Introduction Brief smoking-cessation interventions in primary care settings are effective, but delivery of these services remains low. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Meaningful Use (MU) of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program could increase rates of smoking assessment and cessation assistance among vulnerable populations. This study examined if smoking status assessment, cessation assistance, and odds of being a current smoker changed after Stage 1 MU implementation. Methods EHR data were extracted from 26 community health centers with an EHR in place by June 15, 2009. AORs were computed for each binary outcome (smoking status assessment, counseling given, smoking-cessation medications ordered/discussed, current smoking status), comparing 2010 (pre-MU), 2012 (MU preparation), and 2014 (MU fully implemented) for pregnant and non-pregnant patients. Results Non-pregnant patients had decreased odds of current smoking over time; odds for all other outcomes increased except for medication orders from 2010 to 2012. Among pregnant patients, odds of assessment and counseling increased across all years. Odds of discussing or ordering of cessation medications increased from 2010 compared with the other two study years; however, medication orders alone did not change over time, and current smoking only decreased from 2010 to 2012. Compared with non-pregnant patients, a lower percentage of pregnant patients were provided counseling. Conclusions Findings suggest that incentives for MU of EHRs increase the odds of smoking assessment and cessation assistance, which could lead to decreased smoking rates among vulnerable populations. Continued efforts for provision of cessation assistance among pregnant patients is warranted.

Electronic medical record documentation of tobacco cessation support at eight community safety‐net clinics with a high prevalence of tobacco use

“…In a similar setting of urban health centers, Silfen et al found that 19.2% received counselling, 5.5% received medication only, and 7.8% received both. The findings of the prevalence of documentation of counselling and ordering of tobacco cessation medications in this sample are similar to other studies …”

Cardiovascular Disease Guideline Adherence: An RCT Using Practice Facilitation

“…Rates of tobacco use screening are high in NY and nationally, largely because of Meaningful Use Stage 1 that included this measure, but cessation counseling remains low. 42,43 Combining screening and counseling therefore masks poor performance on the treatment measure. Second, less than half of sites were adhering to the smoking-cessation counseling guideline during the baseline period, which meant there was room for improvement.…”

Trends in smoking documentation rates in safety net clinics

“…This study is the first to examine rates of smoking documentation in EMRs from a multistate sample of CHCs before and after the 2011 changes. In an earlier study of 26 CHCs in Oregon, Bailey et al also found an increase in smoking assessment comparing 2014 to 2010 (adjusted OR 2.52 [95% CI 2.37, 2.69]) although in these CHCs the smoking status documentation rate was high even in 2010 (93.9 percent) …”