2013
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-202991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking cessation in the first trimester reduces most obstetric risks, but not the risks of major congenital anomalies and admission to neonatal care: a population-based cohort study of 1 164 953 singleton pregnancies in Finland

Abstract: Smoking cessation appeared to reduce pregnancy risks close to those of non-smoking peers. Exposure to early pregnancy smoking was, however, associated with an increased admission to neonatal intensive care and an increased prevalence of major congenital anomalies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…68 However, these findings of no significant risk increase in women who smoked but quit earlier in pregnancy may have been limited by smaller sample size (n<11,200) compared to our large cohort of nearly 1 million singleton live births 5,6,8 , In addition, few similar studies included a population of US women, and the findings of those born in other areas of the world may not be applicable given regional and racial differences in birth weights and smoking patterns across the world. 7,8 Finally, one other large U.S. cohort study concluded that quitting smoking in the first trimester reduced risk of FGR compared to a referent group of women who smoked throughout pregnancy. 14 This study also drew the conclusion that quitting smoking in the first trimester brought risk of SGA similar to that of non-smokers, but did not use non-smokers as a referent group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 However, these findings of no significant risk increase in women who smoked but quit earlier in pregnancy may have been limited by smaller sample size (n<11,200) compared to our large cohort of nearly 1 million singleton live births 5,6,8 , In addition, few similar studies included a population of US women, and the findings of those born in other areas of the world may not be applicable given regional and racial differences in birth weights and smoking patterns across the world. 7,8 Finally, one other large U.S. cohort study concluded that quitting smoking in the first trimester reduced risk of FGR compared to a referent group of women who smoked throughout pregnancy. 14 This study also drew the conclusion that quitting smoking in the first trimester brought risk of SGA similar to that of non-smokers, but did not use non-smokers as a referent group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous other studies have shown analogous results related to early smoking cessation and preterm risk relative to that of a non-smoker. 1719 Polakowski et al similarly used birth certificate data, however their study only evaluated preterm births >28 weeks. 18 Our results show a 20% increase in extreme preterm births (20–27 weeks) if cessation occurred after the 1 st trimester.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Accordingly, several interventions that successfully reduce smoking during pregnancy have been shown to result in improvements in perinatal outcomes. [13] In recent years, associations between smoke-free laws and population health have been investigated in a substantial number of quasi-experimental studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available circumstantial evidence indicates that a causal link between smoke-free legislation and a decrease in stillbirths is indeed likely: SHS exposure and tobacco smoking increase the risk of stillbirth [7][8][9]; smoke-free legislation is followed by reductions in SHS exposure and smoking [1,[15][16][17][18][19]; and stillbirth risk is known to normalize after smoking cessation. [12] At the same time, the study needs to be interpreted in the light of the aforementioned methodological limitations associated with its quasi-experimental nature. The continuing roll-out of smoke-free laws across the globe to protect people from ETS offers opportunities for replication of our work in other jurisdictions and can further strengthen (or undermine) confidence in our findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%