2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0893-133x(01)00257-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking History and Nicotine Effects on Cognitive Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
164
3
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
17
164
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Nicotine administration also has been reported to improve reaction time (regardless of smoking status) as well (Ernst et al, 2001a). Consistent with these findings are studies which demonstrate that acute abstinence from smoking (within 12 h) results in slowed response times (Bell et al, 1999;Gross et al, 1993;Thompson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Effect Of Nicotine On Brain Activation During Cognitive Taskssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Nicotine administration also has been reported to improve reaction time (regardless of smoking status) as well (Ernst et al, 2001a). Consistent with these findings are studies which demonstrate that acute abstinence from smoking (within 12 h) results in slowed response times (Bell et al, 1999;Gross et al, 1993;Thompson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Effect Of Nicotine On Brain Activation During Cognitive Taskssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Previous studies investigating the effects of nicotine on attention in nonsmokers without psychiatric disorder have yielded inconsistent findings (Heishman et al, 1993;Le Houezec et al, 1994;Foulds et al, 1996;Levin et al, 1998;Heishman and Henningfield, 2000;Ernst et al, 2001;Mumenthaler et al, 2003;Sacco et al, 2004). Although it has been suggested that individuals with optimal baseline performance may experience deterioration in performance with nAChR stimulation unless task demands are very high (Newhouse et al, 2004), variation in findings may also be attributed to differences in the measure used to assess attentional performance or, as above, to pharmacological differences such as dose or mode of administration of nicotine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of evidence suggests that chronic smoking, independent of substance abuse disorders, is associated with adverse effects on several domains of neurocognition, including executive skills, learning and memory, processing speed, and working memory (e.g., Ernst et al, 2001;Heffernan et al, 2005;Kalmijn et al, 2002;Paul et al, 2006;Razani et al, 2004;Richards et al, 2003). In a large cohort of community-recruited actively drinking and abstinent alcoholics, Glass et al (2006) found that both alcoholism and smoking severity were inversely related to neurocognitive function, and smoking severity (i.e., pack years) was a unique predictor of general intelligence and cognitive proficiency (i.e., an index of both speed and accuracy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%