Smooth and robust solutions for Dirichlet boundary control of fluid–solid conjugate heat transfer problems

Abstract

We study a new optimization scheme that generates smooth and robust solutions for Dirichlet velocity boundary control (DVBC) of conjugate heat transfer (CHT) processes. The solutions to the DVBC of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are typically nonsmooth, due to the regularity degradation of the boundary stress in the adjoint NavierStokes equations. This nonsmoothness is inherited by the solutions to the DVBC of CHT processes, since the CHT process couples the Navier-Stokes equations of fluid motion with the convection-diffusion equations of fluid-solid thermal interaction. Our objective in the CHT boundary control problem is to select optimally the fluid inflow profile that minimizes an objective function that involves the sum of the mismatch between the temperature distribution in the fluid system and a prescribed temperature profile and the cost of the control. Our strategy to resolve the nonsmoothness of the boundary control solution is based on two features, namely, the objective function with a regularization term on the gradient of the control profile on both the continuous and the discrete levels, and the optimization scheme with either explicit or implicit smoothing effects, such as the smoothed Steepest Descent and the Limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (L-BFGS) methods. Our strategy to achieve the robustness of the solution process is based on combining the smoothed optimization scheme with the numerical continuation technique on the regularization parameters in the objective function. In the section of numerical studies, we present two suites of experiments. In the first one, we demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our numerical schemes in recovering the boundary control profile of the standard case of a Poiseuille flow. In the second one, we illustrate the robustness of our optimization schemes via solving more challenging DVBC problems for both the channel flow and the flow past a square cylinder, which use initial control profiles far from optimal and require the numerical continuation technique applied on regularization parameters. We believe our solution strategy is general and can be applied to other large-scale optimal control problems which involve multiphysics processes and require smooth approximations to the optimal control profile.

Analysis of a hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin scheme for the tangential control of the Stokes system

“…After the pioneering works by Glowinski and Lions [33] and Gunzburger [32,[43][44][45][46][47][48], many important developments have been made both theoretically and computationally in the past decades. For an extensive body of literature devoted to this subject we refer to, e.g., [4,5,9,12,14,30,31,49,50,59,66,74,78,[84][85][86] and the references therein. Despite the large amount of existing work on numerical methods for fluid flow control problems, we are not aware of any contributions to the analysis and approximation of the tangential Stokes Dirichlet boundary control problem.…”

An internal penalty discontinuous Galerkin method for simulating conjugate heat transfer in a closed cavity

“…Error p = 1 p = 2 p = 3 p = 4 p = 5 p = 6 2 × 2 (h=0. 5 Table 3. The convergence trend is similar for the horizontal velocity u, vertical velocity v, and fluid temperature T f .…”

An HDG Method for Tangential Boundary Control of Stokes Equations I: High Regularity

“…After the pioneering works by Glowinski and Lions [26] and Gunzburger [25,[33][34][35][36][37][38], many important developments have been made both theoretically and computationally in the past decades. For an extensive body of literature devoted to this subject we refer to, e.g., [3,4,7,9,11,23,24,39,40,50,55,62,65,[70][71][72] and the references therein. Despite the large amount of existing work on numerical methods for fluid flow control problems, we are not aware of any contributions to the analysis and approximation of the tangential Stokes Dirichlet boundary control problem.…”