2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-015-1348-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smooth approximation of plurisubharmonic functions on almost complex manifolds

Abstract: This note establishes smooth approximation from above for Jplurisubharmonic functions on an almost complex manifold (X, J). The following theorem is proved. Suppose X is J-pseudoconvex, i.e., X admits a smooth strictly J-plurisubharmonic exhaustion function. Let u be an (upper semi-continuous) J-plurisubharmonic function on X. Then there exists a sequence u j ∈ C ∞ (X) of smooth strictly Jplurisubharmonic functions point-wise decreasing down to u.In any almost complex manifold (X, J) each point has a fundament… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…functions ϕ for which √ −1∂∂ϕ > 0 (see e.g. [11,25,27,28,33,36,37]), and our main theorem fits well into this picture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…functions ϕ for which √ −1∂∂ϕ > 0 (see e.g. [11,25,27,28,33,36,37]), and our main theorem fits well into this picture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Harvey and Lawson, after viewing a preliminary version of this paper, informed the author that using viscosity methods it is possible to prove it in any dimension. It will be explained in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the approximating sequence is assumed to be only continuous on , then the corresponding result was proved by Cegrell [18, Theorem 2.1] in the case , and Lu [46, Theorem 1.7.1] for general m . In connection with Theorem 5.2, we would like to make a remark on Theorem 6.1 in a recent paper by Harvey et al [34]. There they prove a similar approximation theorem, but there is an essential difference.…”
Section: The Existence Of Smooth Exhaustion Functionsmentioning
confidence: 94%