2015 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/apec.2015.7104685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smooth switching controllers for reliable induction motor drive operation after sensor failures

Abstract: This paper presents a switching control method that can be actuated by a supervisory controller, with emphasis on smooth transitions between various open and closed loop controllers in real time. Through conversion of commands into non-periodic voltage values in the synchronous qd0 reference frame, hand-off transient reduction is achieved by controlling the rate of change of stator voltage commands during changeover. Through this method, smooth switched supervisory control can be achieved without synchronizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another type of FTC methods has been also presented in the literature, in which the sensors FTC algorithm changes the control according to the type of the faulty sensor, as proposed in Refs. [11][12][13][14]. A smooth FTC of IM drives with sensor failures is presented in the works [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another type of FTC methods has been also presented in the literature, in which the sensors FTC algorithm changes the control according to the type of the faulty sensor, as proposed in Refs. [11][12][13][14]. A smooth FTC of IM drives with sensor failures is presented in the works [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14]. A smooth FTC of IM drives with sensor failures is presented in the works [11,12]. In the healthy state, the IM drive's operation is accomplished using direct torque control; indirect field-oriented control is then used when the dc-link voltage sensor fails, and v/f control is utilized during current sensors failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four different controllers are used in this method: Indirect Rotor Field Oriented Control (IRFOC) to overcome faults caused by the voltage sensor, speed sensorless vector control to compensate for interruptions coming from the speed sensor breakdown, scalar current magnitude control to overcom failures provoked by abnormal functioning of current sensors, and open-loop control in case where no sensor is operating correctly. A smooth FTC of IM drives with sensor failures is presented in [30,31]. Comparing to the method mentioned previously, the authors have successfully reduced the number of controllers from four to three, using direct torque control, IRFOC, and volt/hertz (V/f) control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained in [8] offer a solution to the succession of faults in the different sensors but the number of the used adaptive observers is still three. Another type of FTC methods has been also presented in the literature, in which the sensors FTC algorithm changes the control according to the type of the faulty sensor, as proposed in [11]- [14]. A smooth FTC of IM drives with sensor failures is presented in [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another type of FTC methods has been also presented in the literature, in which the sensors FTC algorithm changes the control according to the type of the faulty sensor, as proposed in [11]- [14]. A smooth FTC of IM drives with sensor failures is presented in [11], [12]. In the healthy state, the IM drive's operation is accomplished using direct torque control; indirect field oriented control is then used when the dc-link voltage sensor fails, and v/f control is utilized during current sensors failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%