2007
DOI: 10.1198/106186007x204528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothing Spline Estimation of Variance Functions

Abstract: This article considers spline smoothing of variance functions. We focus on selection of smoothing parameters and develop three direct data-driven methods: unbiased risk (UBR), generalized approximate cross validation (GACV) and generalized maximum likelihood (GML). In addition to guaranteed convergence, simulations show that these direct methods perform better than existing indirect UBR, generalized cross validation (GCV) and GML methods. The direct UBR and GML methods perform better than the GACV method. An a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yau and Kohn (2003), for example, modeled log{ v ( X )} using flexible mixtures of polynomial and thin-plate splines. Liu, et al (2006) proposed a penalized mixture of smoothing splines, whereas Chan, et al (2006) considered mixtures of locally adaptive radial basis functions.…”
Section: Density Deconvolution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yau and Kohn (2003), for example, modeled log{ v ( X )} using flexible mixtures of polynomial and thin-plate splines. Liu, et al (2006) proposed a penalized mixture of smoothing splines, whereas Chan, et al (2006) considered mixtures of locally adaptive radial basis functions.…”
Section: Density Deconvolution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, at each iteration, we compute the working variable z k =g k + y k exp(−g k ) − 1 and weight w k = 1 where tilde indicates current estimates. Note that, as [Pawitan and O'Sullivan (1994)], we use the Fisher scoring method instead of the Newton-Raphson method employed in Wahba et al (1995), Gu (2002) and Liu, Tong and Wang (2006). Our experience indicates that the Fisher scoring method is more stable in this situation.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for generalized smoothing spline models, direct methods are proposed to overcome the convergence problem and improve effectiveness [29,31,16].…”
Section: Indirect Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%